[OE-core] [PATCH 4/5] gtk-icon-cache: call postinst scriplet at do_rootfs time

Andreas Müller schnitzeltony at googlemail.com
Sat Aug 4 09:29:42 UTC 2012


On Sat, Aug 4, 2012 at 9:49 AM, Laurentiu Palcu
<laurentiu.palcu at intel.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 08/04/2012 02:22 AM, Andreas Müller wrote:
>> On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 10:19 PM, Laurentiu Palcu
>> <laurentiu.palcu at intel.com> wrote:
>>> This will improve first boot time because building the icon cache is
>>> done on host, with more processing power than the target.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Laurentiu Palcu <laurentiu.palcu at intel.com>
>>> ---
>>>  meta/classes/gtk-icon-cache.bbclass |   10 ++--------
>>>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/meta/classes/gtk-icon-cache.bbclass b/meta/classes/gtk-icon-cache.bbclass
>>> index 01fb2f3..2d82c54 100644
>>> --- a/meta/classes/gtk-icon-cache.bbclass
>>> +++ b/meta/classes/gtk-icon-cache.bbclass
>>> @@ -1,18 +1,12 @@
>>>  FILES_${PN} += "${datadir}/icons/hicolor"
>>>
>>> -DEPENDS += "${@['hicolor-icon-theme', '']['${BPN}' == 'hicolor-icon-theme']}"
>>> +DEPENDS += "${@['hicolor-icon-theme', '']['${BPN}' == 'hicolor-icon-theme']} gtk+-native"
>>>
>>> -# This could run on the host as icon cache files are architecture independent,
>>> -# but there is no gtk-update-icon-cache built natively.
>>>  gtk_icon_cache_postinst() {
>>> -if [ "x$D" != "x" ]; then
>>> -        exit 1
>>> -fi
>>> -
>>>  # Update the pixbuf loaders in case they haven't been registered yet
>>>  GDK_PIXBUF_MODULEDIR=${libdir}/gdk-pixbuf-2.0/2.10.0/loaders gdk-pixbuf-query-loaders --update-cache
>>>
>>> -for icondir in /usr/share/icons/* ; do
>>> +for icondir in $D/usr/share/icons/* ; do
>>>      if [ -d $icondir ] ; then
>>>          gtk-update-icon-cache -fqt  $icondir
>>>      fi
>>> --
>>> 1.7.9.5
>>>
>> Long time ago there was a patch introducing gtk-icon-cache to be only
>> run once on the machine [1] and I am still using that. At that time I
>> was asked for a more generic approach. Now I ask:
>>
>> 1. Wouldn't it be better to have gtk-icon-cache run once even on host
> But this is what these patches do. Make gtk-update-icon-cache run on
> host, when the target rootfs is constructed, rather than running it on
> target, at first boot.
As far as I can see gtk-icon-cache is run for each package - how much
extra build time at do_rootfs is to expect?

Andreas
>
> Thanks,
> Laurentiu
>
>> 2. Or better: How about a postinst 'runonce' framework for host/machine?
>>
>> Andreas
>>
>> [1] http://patches.openembedded.org/patch/24179/
>>




More information about the Openembedded-core mailing list