[OE-core] [PATCH 4/5] gtk-icon-cache: call postinst scriplet at do_rootfs time

Andreas Müller schnitzeltony at googlemail.com
Mon Aug 6 08:10:12 UTC 2012


On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 9:48 AM, Laurentiu Palcu
<laurentiu.palcu at intel.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 08/06/2012 01:49 AM, Andreas Müller wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 12:30 AM, Andreas Müller
>> <schnitzeltony at googlemail.com> wrote:
>>> On Sun, Aug 5, 2012 at 6:58 PM, Laurentiu Palcu
>>> <laurentiu.palcu at intel.com> wrote:
>>>> You could give it a test yourselves and let me know your results. I will
>>>> send a version 2 of the patchset(as soon as we all agree on the
>>>> solution), with some changes suggested by Mark and some PR bumps
>>>> suggested by Koen.
>>> With the image I usually work with [1] and AMD Phenom II X6 1090 16GB
>>> RAM I get a measurable delay - see attachment. I would not be happy
>>> loosing latest do_rootfs enhancements (off topic - thanks for that).
>>> Remeber we are only talking of gtk-update-icon-cache. OK I could buy
>>> an intel host and work just with sato images but...
> I suppose you could, but nobody asked you to do that, it's your choice
> what's your build machine or what you'll be building for.
>
> Thanks for the measurements though. They do, indeed, show quite a
> significant amount of time (around 6 minutes). A run-once solution is to
> be considered in this case.
>
>>>
>>> Andreas
>>>
>>> [1] https://gitorious.org/schnitzeltony-oe-meta/meta-misc/blobs/master/recipes-image/xfce-full-image.bb
>> OK I know it is not that important: The image created with this patch
>> series creates tons of messages like
> Why do you think is not important. Please elaborate. Or is it irony?
Yes sorry - it was late night.
> I don't think is in anybody's benefit if you take this approach. :) All
> errors/warnings are important and they have to be taken care of.
>
>>
>> xfdesktop:446): GdkPixbuf-WARNING **: Cannot open pixbuf loader module
>> file '/usr/lib/gdk-pixbuf-2.0/2.10.0/loaders.cache': No such file or
>> directory
>>
>> and don't have icons at all. Did you run test that (on a hardware
>> plattform different to your host)?
> I only tested on qemu. And it worked just fine, without any errors. With
> all icons in place.
Which hardware did you emulate? My tests were done for overo (ARM
cortext A8). I wonder if the created database is machine specific.

Andreas




More information about the Openembedded-core mailing list