[OE-core] [PATCH][for-denzil 1/8] opkg-utils: bump SRCREV for Packages cache fix and other fixes

[Scott Garman]

On 08/07/2012 01:19 AM, Koen Kooi wrote:
>
> Op 7 aug. 2012, om 10:17 heeft Martin Jansa <martin.jansa at gmail.com> het volgende geschreven:
>
>> On Tue, Aug 07, 2012 at 09:44:41AM +0200, Koen Kooi wrote:
>>> From: Martin Jansa <martin.jansa at gmail.com>
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Martin Jansa <Martin.Jansa at gmail.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Koen Kooi <koen at dominion.thruhere.net>
>>> ---
>>> .../opkg-utils/opkg-utils/add-license-field.patch  |   39 -----------
>>> .../opkg-utils/arfile_header_split.patch           |   27 --------
>>> .../opkg-utils/index-ignore-filenotfound.patch     |   73 --------------------
>>> .../opkg-utils/opkg-utils/mtime-int.patch          |   30 --------
>>> .../opkg-utils/opkg-utils/shebang.patch            |   46 ------------
>>> meta/recipes-devtools/opkg-utils/opkg-utils_git.bb |    7 +-
>>> 6 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 221 deletions(-)
>>> delete mode 100644 meta/recipes-devtools/opkg-utils/opkg-utils/add-license-field.patch
>>> delete mode 100644 meta/recipes-devtools/opkg-utils/opkg-utils/arfile_header_split.patch
>>> delete mode 100644 meta/recipes-devtools/opkg-utils/opkg-utils/index-ignore-filenotfound.patch
>>> delete mode 100644 meta/recipes-devtools/opkg-utils/opkg-utils/mtime-int.patch
>>> delete mode 100644 meta/recipes-devtools/opkg-utils/opkg-utils/shebang.patch
>>> diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/opkg-utils/opkg-utils_git.bb b/meta/recipes-devtools/opkg-utils/opkg-utils_git.bb
>>> index 4fe4038..1996c75 100644
>>> --- a/meta/recipes-devtools/opkg-utils/opkg-utils_git.bb
>>> +++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/opkg-utils/opkg-utils_git.bb
>>> @@ -6,16 +6,11 @@ LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://COPYING;md5=94d55d512a9ba36caa9b7df079bae19f \
>>>                      file://opkg.py;beginline=1;endline=18;md5=15917491ad6bf7acc666ca5f7cc1e083"
>>> RDEPENDS_${PN} = "python"
>>> RDEPENDS_${PN}_virtclass-native = ""
>>> -SRCREV = "16665959c330b5958c0f0f4624a9ca7f823f98de"
>>> +SRCREV = "44df9dd3dc411ca1255cb4b23bde7eb71aed4778"
>>
>> Better to use latest for this (only 3 commits, 2 of them fixing
>> python-2.6)
>
> Should I cherry-pick them from master to keep history or just make a single, new update to latest SRCREV for the denzil branch?

I slightly favor cherry-picks from master when possible.

Thanks,

Scott

-- 
Scott Garman
Embedded Linux Engineer - Yocto Project
Intel Open Source Technology Center