[OE-core] [PATCH 1/1] at 3.1.13: get 'at' depends on 'flex-native' explicitly
Saul Wold
sgw at linux.intel.com
Thu Aug 9 13:57:08 UTC 2012
On 08/09/2012 05:59 AM, wenzong.fan at windriver.com wrote:
> From: Wenzong Fan <wenzong.fan at windriver.com>
>
> 'at' needs flex to generate source file lex.yy.c, but it doesn't
> depend on flex-native directly; This maybe cause a do_compile
> failure if flex-native is not built or included in project.
>
> Error message is:
> error: lex.yy.c: No such file or directory
>
> Get 'at' depends on flex-native to fix this potential issue.
>
> [YOCTO #2919]
>
> Signed-off-by: Wenzong Fan <wenzong.fan at windriver.com>
> ---
> meta/recipes-extended/at/at_3.1.13.bb | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/meta/recipes-extended/at/at_3.1.13.bb b/meta/recipes-extended/at/at_3.1.13.bb
> index ce9396a..a391d6e 100644
> --- a/meta/recipes-extended/at/at_3.1.13.bb
> +++ b/meta/recipes-extended/at/at_3.1.13.bb
> @@ -4,14 +4,14 @@ the system load levels drop to a particular level."
> SECTION = "base"
> LICENSE="GPLv2+"
> LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://COPYING;md5=4325afd396febcb659c36b49533135d4"
> -DEPENDS = "flex initscripts \
> +DEPENDS = "flex flex-native initscripts \
Ok, I understand the flex-native dependency, that makes sense, but I
wonder why there was a dependency on flex originally? Is that actually
needed?
Sau!
> ${@base_contains('DISTRO_FEATURES', 'pam', 'libpam', '', d)}"
> RDEPENDS_${PN} = "${@base_contains('DISTRO_FEATURES', 'pam', '${PAM_DEPS}', '', d)}"
> PAM_DEPS = "libpam libpam-runtime pam-plugin-env pam-plugin-limits"
>
> RCONFLICTS_${PN} = "atd"
> RREPLACES_${PN} = "atd"
> -PR = "r2"
> +PR = "r3"
>
> SRC_URI = "${DEBIAN_MIRROR}/main/a/at/at_${PV}.orig.tar.gz \
> file://configure.patch \
>
More information about the Openembedded-core
mailing list