[OE-core] [PATCH 0/2] Remove older GTK+ versions

Martin Jansa martin.jansa at gmail.com
Fri Aug 17 12:39:16 UTC 2012


On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 01:32:59PM +0100, Paul Eggleton wrote:
> On Friday 17 August 2012 14:30:17 Martin Jansa wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 01:27:20PM +0100, Paul Eggleton wrote:
> > > On Friday 17 August 2012 12:35:07 Ross Burton wrote:
> > > > If someone still wants to use them, meta-oe is a better place for them
> > > > to
> > > > live.
> > > 
> > > As a general note, personally I'd rather that no more alternative versions
> > > of anything be added to meta-oe.
> > 
> > Yes especially with DEFAULT_PREFERRENCE not working between layers.. so
> > everyone with meta-oe and without P_V set, would get this old version..
> 
> The best plan it would seem to me would be to have a separate meta-archive or 
> meta-attic or similar named layer for these older recipes, and set its layer 
> priority to the same as OE-Core.

Should I file a but to fix DEFAULT_PREFERENCE between layers? 

Because there is also use case when newer development version is added 
to e.g. meta-oe with negative D_P and only users who decide to test/use
that version should get it, if they define P_V for this new version.

Currently it would became default version for all meta-oe users without
P_V specified, which isn't very intuitive.

Cheers,

-- 
Martin 'JaMa' Jansa     jabber: Martin.Jansa at gmail.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/attachments/20120817/bd654a14/attachment-0002.sig>


More information about the Openembedded-core mailing list