[OE-core] [PATCH] libproxy: add dependency on glib-2.0

[Paul Gortmaker]

On 12-08-17 12:57 PM, Richard Purdie wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-08-13 at 18:43 -0400, Paul Gortmaker wrote:
>> Without this, you will get occasional build failures if libproxy
>> tries to build before the glib headers are placed in the sysroot.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker at windriver.com>
>>
>> diff --git a/meta/recipes-support/libproxy/libproxy_0.4.7.bb b/meta/recipes-support/libproxy/libproxy_0.4.7.bb
>> index 7e3cf27..a39e3a8 100644
>> --- a/meta/recipes-support/libproxy/libproxy_0.4.7.bb
>> +++ b/meta/recipes-support/libproxy/libproxy_0.4.7.bb
>> @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ LICENSE = "LGPLv2.1+"
>>  LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://COPYING;md5=7d7044444a7b1b116e8783edcdb44ff4 \
>>                      file://utils/proxy.c;beginline=1;endline=18;md5=55152a1006d7dafbef32baf9c30a99c0"
>>  
>> -DEPENDS = "gconf"
>> +DEPENDS = "gconf glib-2.0"
>>  
> 
> We've gone around in circles on this and had issues over circular
> dependencies. The bottom line is that we don't need glib-2.0 here, we
> want to disable the glib-2.0 using components of libproxy. I don't know

Fair enough.

Can we _finally_ fix the mailing lists to not override the To/Cc lines
with crap Reply-To: lines?  Once again I almost missed seeing this reply,
since I was no longer on the To/Cc.

AFAICT, all were in agreement that it was broken, but it never got fixed.

Thanks,
Paul.
--

> cmake well enough to know how to configure it to do this though (instead
> of autodetecting)
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Richard
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-core mailing list
> Openembedded-core at lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
> 
>