[OE-core] [discussion] perf: specify SLANG_INC dir for perf

[Bruce Ashfield]

On 12-08-17 09:05 AM, Liang Li wrote:
> On 2012-08-17 21:01, Liang Li<liang.li at windriver.com>  wrote:
>> On 2012-08-17 18:53, Richard Purdie<richard.purdie at linuxfoundation.org>  wrote:
>>> On Fri, 2012-08-17 at 18:00 +0800, Liang Li wrote:
>>>> I am totally confused, you mentioned 'general kernel do_install', I
>>>> assume it's oe-core kernel.bbclass concept. Then you mentioned 'get
>>>> the fix upstream in the mainline kernel', how could that happen?
>>>>
>>>> We are discussing about the solution to 'fix the compile warning to
>>>> error' stuff that triggered by the '-I/usr/include/slang', right?
>>>
>>> Yes.
>>>
>>>>   We do not necessarily have to change recipe to fix it since the issue
>>>> is not introduced by the recipe, the hard coded '-I/usr/include/slang'
>>>> in the Makefile cause the issue, we can fix the root cause by kernel
>>>> patch(other than just comment the line out). I see your previous patch
>>>> to kernel, by comment out the '-I/usr/include/slang' line in the
>>>> Makefile, is the same behavior, but we won't have the change(comment
>>>> out -I.. in Makefile) upstream to mainline, right?
>>>
>>> I am suggesting that firstly, someone send a patch to the mainline
>>> kernel which changes -I/usr/include/slang to -I=/usr/include/slang in
>>> that Makefile.
>>>
>>> Secondly, I'm suggesting that we add a line to kernel_do_install() in
>>> kernel.bbclass which does a sed on the Makefile as installed into
>>> $kerneldir which changes -I/usr/include/slang to -I=/usr/include/slang.
>>>
>>> We can then drop the patch I added to the linux-yocto kernels.
>>>
>>> This is all that should be needed, it should fix all the issues people
>>> have reported in a way that is acceptable to everyone.
>>>
>>
>> Ah, I see what you mean now. But we have push acceptable kernel patch
>

One final (I hope) follow up on this.

Liang: were you going to put together (and test) the 'sed fix' for
kernel.bbclass ?

I have my own set of issues that are consuming my time now, and I want
to ensure that this doesn't fall through the cracks, since we need a
full/real fix for this as soon as possible.

Cheers,

Bruce


> Sorry, I mean 'we can ...' instead of 'we have ...', just typo.