[OE-core] [PATCH] libproxy: add dependency on glib-2.0

[McClintock Matthew-B29882]

On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 8:50 AM, Paul Gortmaker
<paul.gortmaker at windriver.com> wrote:
> On 12-08-17 05:41 PM, Richard Purdie wrote:
>> On Fri, 2012-08-17 at 14:07 -0400, Paul Gortmaker wrote:
>>> On 12-08-17 12:57 PM, Richard Purdie wrote:
>>>> On Mon, 2012-08-13 at 18:43 -0400, Paul Gortmaker wrote:
>>>>> Without this, you will get occasional build failures if libproxy
>>>>> tries to build before the glib headers are placed in the sysroot.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker at windriver.com>
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/meta/recipes-support/libproxy/libproxy_0.4.7.bb b/meta/recipes-support/libproxy/libproxy_0.4.7.bb
>>>>> index 7e3cf27..a39e3a8 100644
>>>>> --- a/meta/recipes-support/libproxy/libproxy_0.4.7.bb
>>>>> +++ b/meta/recipes-support/libproxy/libproxy_0.4.7.bb
>>>>> @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ LICENSE = "LGPLv2.1+"
>>>>>  LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://COPYING;md5=7d7044444a7b1b116e8783edcdb44ff4 \
>>>>>                      file://utils/proxy.c;beginline=1;endline=18;md5=55152a1006d7dafbef32baf9c30a99c0"
>>>>>
>>>>> -DEPENDS = "gconf"
>>>>> +DEPENDS = "gconf glib-2.0"
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> We've gone around in circles on this and had issues over circular
>>>> dependencies. The bottom line is that we don't need glib-2.0 here, we
>>>> want to disable the glib-2.0 using components of libproxy. I don't know
>>>
>>> Fair enough.
>>>
>>> Can we _finally_ fix the mailing lists to not override the To/Cc lines
>>> with crap Reply-To: lines?  Once again I almost missed seeing this reply,
>>> since I was no longer on the To/Cc.
>>>
>>> AFAICT, all were in agreement that it was broken, but it never got fixed.
>>
>> There were a few things causing problems here such as lost admin access.
>> Those have been resolved and I just changed the setting that I think was
>> causing the problems. Let me know if there are still issues...
>
> Looks good now, thanks a lot. Much appreciated by many, I'm sure.

Awesome, looks to be working for me too. Did you do oe-devel as well?

-M