[OE-core] [PATCH] coreutils: Upgrade to upstream version 8.17

Radu Moisan radu.moisan at intel.com
Wed Aug 22 14:24:51 UTC 2012


On 08/22/2012 05:08 PM, Chris Larson wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 3:43 AM, Radu Moisan <radu.moisan at intel.com> wrote:
>> diff --git a/meta/recipes-core/coreutils/coreutils-8.17/realpath-works-yes.patch b/meta/recipes-core/coreutils/coreutils-8.17/realpath-works-yes.patch
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..e32f612
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/meta/recipes-core/coreutils/coreutils-8.17/realpath-works-yes.patch
>> @@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
>> +Signed-off-by: Radu Moisan <radu.moisan at intel.com>
>> +Upstream status: pending
>> +
>> +The new version of coreutils, adds use of canonicalize_file_name() function defined in canonicalize.h
>> +The problem: the function is redefined to rpl_canonicalize_file_name by means of a macro,which gives
>> +an undefined reference error at compile time. Macro definition depends in the end on
>> +gl_cv_func_realpath_works but assumed true only when set to "yes"
>> +
>> +Index: coreutils-8.17/m4/canonicalize.m4
>> +===================================================================
>> +--- coreutils-8.17.orig/m4/canonicalize.m4     2012-05-08 12:05:23.000000000 +0300
>> ++++ coreutils-8.17/m4/canonicalize.m4  2012-08-17 14:20:22.000000000 +0300
>> +@@ -95,7 +95,7 @@
>> +      [gl_cv_func_realpath_works=no],
>> +      [case "$host_os" in
>> +                 # Guess yes on glibc systems.
>> +-        *-gnu*) gl_cv_func_realpath_works="guessing yes" ;;
>> ++        *-gnu*) gl_cv_func_realpath_works="yes" ;;
>> +                 # If we don't know, assume the worst.
>> +         *)      gl_cv_func_realpath_works="guessing no" ;;
>> +       esac
> Wouldn't it be better to provide a cached test result in the site
> files for this test, rather than relying on a host_os based guess?
I really don't know the answer to your question. The patch was intended 
to provide minimally invasive change to the original file. If you 
elaborate more on your proposal, I would gladly take into consideration 
a future patch to address this issue.

radu




More information about the Openembedded-core mailing list