[OE-core] [PATCH 2/3] util-linux: Update from 2.21 -> 2.22

Khem Raj raj.khem at gmail.com
Mon Dec 3 05:57:30 UTC 2012


On Sun, Dec 2, 2012 at 8:37 PM, Saul Wold <sgw at linux.intel.com> wrote:

>  2.21 has some linking issues with gold on uclibc where mount
>> program does not work. Its some sort of underlinking.
>>
>> 2.22 did not solve that problem completely either
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <raj.khem at gmail.com>
>> ---
>>   meta/recipes-core/util-linux/**util-linux.inc        |   18
>> +++++++++++-------
>>   .../util-linux/add-aarch64-**support.patch           |    4 ++--
>>   .../util-linux/uclibc-__**progname-conflict.patch    |   14
>> +++++++-------
>>   .../util-linux-ng-replace-**siginterrupt.patch       |   14
>> +++++++-------
>>   .../{util-linux_2.21.2.bb => util-linux_2.22.bb}   |    8 +++-----
>>   5 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
>>   rename meta/recipes-core/util-linux/{**util-linux_2.21.2.bb<http://util-linux_2.21.2.bb>=>
>> util-linux_2.22.bb} (88%)
>>
>> diff --git a/meta/recipes-core/util-**linux/util-linux.inc
>> b/meta/recipes-core/util-**linux/util-linux.inc
>> index f2f9a04..00b332a 100644
>> --- a/meta/recipes-core/util-**linux/util-linux.inc
>> +++ b/meta/recipes-core/util-**linux/util-linux.inc
>> @@ -8,16 +8,16 @@ SECTION = "base"
>>   LICENSE = "GPLv2+ & LGPLv2.1+ & BSD"
>>
>>   LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://README.licensing;md5=**
>> 9c920d811858a74b67a36ba23cbaa9**5f \
>> -                    file://COPYING;md5=**59530bdf33659b29e73d4adb9f9f65*
>> *52 \
>> -                    file://Documentation/licenses/**COPYING.GPLv2;md5=**
>> 8ca43cbc842c2336e835926c2166c2**8b \
>> -                    file://Documentation/licenses/**
>> COPYING.LGPLv2.1;md5=**bbb461211a33b134d42ed5ee802b37**ff \
>> +                    file://COPYING;md5=**b234ee4d69f5fce4486a80fdaf4a42*
>> *63 \
>> +                    file://Documentation/licenses/**COPYING.GPLv2;md5=**
>> b234ee4d69f5fce4486a80fdaf4a42**63 \
>> +                    file://Documentation/licenses/**
>> COPYING.LGPLv2.1;md5=**4fbd65380cdd255951079008b36451**6c \
>>                       file://Documentation/licenses/**COPYING.BSD-3;md5=*
>> *58dcd8452651fc8b07d1f65ce07ca8**af \
>> -                    file://Documentation/licenses/**COPYING.UCB;md5=**
>> 263860f8968d8bafa5392cab742852**62 \
>> -                    file://getopt/COPYING;md5=**
>> c3a41733416fb80af7ba1b7e1f7125**51"
>> +                    file://Documentation/licenses/**COPYING.UCB;md5=**
>> 263860f8968d8bafa5392cab742852**62"
>>
>>   inherit autotools gettext pkgconfig
>>   DEPENDS = "zlib ncurses"
>>   DEPENDS_append_class-native = " lzo-native"
>> +DEPENDS_append_class-target = " libpam"
>>
>>
> Forgot to ask in my other email, why the dependency on libpam here? Should
> this not be under a check for pam in DISTRO_FEATURES?


it did not build without pam. Try it out may be I was wrong.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/attachments/20121202/e3b58cea/attachment-0002.html>


More information about the Openembedded-core mailing list