[OE-core] [PATCH 2/3] util-linux: Update from 2.21 -> 2.22
Khem Raj
raj.khem at gmail.com
Tue Dec 4 19:51:57 UTC 2012
I always build with OE-core standalone
On Sun, Dec 2, 2012 at 11:40 PM, Saul Wold <sgw at linux.intel.com> wrote:
> On 12/02/2012 09:57 PM, Khem Raj wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Dec 2, 2012 at 8:37 PM, Saul Wold <sgw at linux.intel.com
>> <mailto:sgw at linux.intel.com>> wrote:
>>
>> 2.21 has some linking issues with gold on uclibc where mount
>> program does not work. Its some sort of underlinking.
>>
>> 2.22 did not solve that problem completely either
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <raj.khem at gmail.com
>> <mailto:raj.khem at gmail.com>>
>> ---
>> meta/recipes-core/util-linux/_**_util-linux.inc | 18
>> +++++++++++-------
>> .../util-linux/add-aarch64-__**support.patch | 4
>> ++--
>> .../util-linux/uclibc-____**progname-conflict.patch | 14
>> +++++++-------
>> .../util-linux-ng-replace-__**siginterrupt.patch | 14
>> +++++++-------
>> .../{util-linux_2.21.2.bb <http://util-linux_2.21.2.bb> =>
>> util-linux_2.22.bb <http://util-linux_2.22.bb>} | 8 +++-----
>>
>> 5 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
>> rename meta/recipes-core/util-linux/{**__util-linux_2.21.2.bb
>> <http://util-linux_2.21.2.bb> => util-linux_2.22.bb
>> <http://util-linux_2.22.bb>} (88%)
>>
>> diff --git a/meta/recipes-core/util-__**linux/util-linux.inc
>> b/meta/recipes-core/util-__**linux/util-linux.inc
>> index f2f9a04..00b332a 100644
>> --- a/meta/recipes-core/util-__**linux/util-linux.inc
>> +++ b/meta/recipes-core/util-__**linux/util-linux.inc
>>
>> @@ -8,16 +8,16 @@ SECTION = "base"
>> LICENSE = "GPLv2+ & LGPLv2.1+ & BSD"
>>
>> LIC_FILES_CHKSUM =
>> "file://README.licensing;md5=_**_**9c920d811858a74b67a36ba23cbaa9
>> **__5f \
>> -
>> file://COPYING;md5=__**59530bdf33659b29e73d4adb9f9f65**__52 \
>> -
>> file://Documentation/licenses/**__COPYING.GPLv2;md5=__**
>> 8ca43cbc842c2336e835926c2166c2**__8b \
>> -
>> file://Documentation/licenses/**__COPYING.LGPLv2.1;md5=__**
>> bbb461211a33b134d42ed5ee802b37**__ff \
>> +
>> file://COPYING;md5=__**b234ee4d69f5fce4486a80fdaf4a42**__63 \
>> +
>> file://Documentation/licenses/**__COPYING.GPLv2;md5=__**
>> b234ee4d69f5fce4486a80fdaf4a42**__63 \
>> +
>> file://Documentation/licenses/**__COPYING.LGPLv2.1;md5=__**
>> 4fbd65380cdd255951079008b36451**__6c \
>>
>> file://Documentation/licenses/**__COPYING.BSD-3;md5=__**
>> 58dcd8452651fc8b07d1f65ce07ca8**__af
>> \
>> -
>> file://Documentation/licenses/**__COPYING.UCB;md5=__**
>> 263860f8968d8bafa5392cab742852**__62 \
>> -
>> file://getopt/COPYING;md5=__**c3a41733416fb80af7ba1b7e1f7125**
>> __51"
>> +
>> file://Documentation/licenses/**__COPYING.UCB;md5=__**
>> 263860f8968d8bafa5392cab742852**__62"
>>
>>
>> inherit autotools gettext pkgconfig
>> DEPENDS = "zlib ncurses"
>> DEPENDS_append_class-native = " lzo-native"
>> +DEPENDS_append_class-target = " libpam"
>>
>>
>> Forgot to ask in my other email, why the dependency on libpam here?
>> Should this not be under a check for pam in DISTRO_FEATURES?
>>
>>
>> it did not build without pam. Try it out may be I was wrong.
>>
>
> Seemed to work fine for me with Poky, was this a non-distro setting?
>
> Sau!
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/attachments/20121204/4a3b64f9/attachment-0002.html>
More information about the Openembedded-core
mailing list