[OE-core] [PATCH 2/5] rootfs generation: export two new variables to postinst scriptlets

[Richard Purdie]

On Tue, 2012-12-04 at 13:07 -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 11:59 AM, Laurentiu Palcu
> <laurentiu.palcu at intel.com> wrote:
>         In order for the postinst scriptlets to be able to run once we
>         need to
>         export the location of the intercept scripts and also the
>         location of
>         native sysrootfs. The gdk-pixbuf binaries will need the latter
>         because
>         in order to generate the loaders.cache it will need to scan
>         some shared
>         libraries that must be native. Even though the output is a
>         text file.
>         
>         Signed-off-by: Laurentiu Palcu <laurentiu.palcu at intel.com>
>         ---
>          meta/classes/package_rpm.bbclass |    2 ++
>          meta/classes/rootfs_deb.bbclass  |    2 ++
>          meta/classes/rootfs_ipk.bbclass  |    2 ++
>          3 files changed, 6 insertions(+)
>         
>         diff --git a/meta/classes/package_rpm.bbclass
>         b/meta/classes/package_rpm.bbclass
>         index 1ff92ce..c7ac07a 100644
>         --- a/meta/classes/package_rpm.bbclass
>         +++ b/meta/classes/package_rpm.bbclass
>         @@ -475,6 +475,8 @@ export D="${target_rootfs}"
>          export OFFLINE_ROOT="\$D"
>          export IPKG_OFFLINE_ROOT="\$D"
>          export OPKG_OFFLINE_ROOT="\$D"
>         +export INTERCEPT_DIR="${WORKDIR}/intercept_scripts"
>         +export NATIVE_ROOT=${STAGING_DIR_NATIVE}
> 
> 
> The NATIVE_ROOT seems a duplication, I'd prefer you to use
> STAGING_DIR_NATIVE in code as this is a known variable name and makes
> it easy to understand.
 
I'm going to disagree on that, I think this does make sense in the
context of the functions we're changing here.

On the other hand I'd love to simplify the whole *OFFLINE_ROOT mess but
that is for a different patch...

Cheers,

Richard