[OE-core] [PATCH 0/4] linux-yocto: consolidated pull request

[Tom Zanussi]

On Wed, 2012-12-05 at 15:48 +0000, Burton, Ross wrote:
> On 21 November 2012 21:32, Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfield at windriver.com> wrote:
> > atom-pc should probably be using the 3.4 kernel, but that's a
> > question for Darren/Tom/Nitin (so I've added them to the cc), since
> > there may be a reason (with respect to graphics) as to why it is on
> > 3.0.
> 
> Ping Darren/Tom/Nitin.
> 
> atom-pc is certainly lagging behind by still being on 3.0, and I can't
> see any reason why we'd want to stick with 3.0 for graphics.  In fact
> as the most common graphics driver used on atom-pc is a i965 we want a
> modern kernel as that is where the development is.
> 

I don't know of any technical reason for it to still be at 3.0.

Until recently all of the 'core machines' were at 3.0 and probably the
assumption was that whoever upgraded those in the past would also be
upgrading atom-pc - has that changed?.

So who does own the core machines and if that doesn't cover atom-pc,
then who owns that?

Tom

> (this may explain why my GPU crashes when I stress it under Yocto)
> 
> Ross
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-core mailing list
> Openembedded-core at lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core