[OE-core] remaining few uses of "pnum=" for patches

Robert P. J. Day rpjday at crashcourse.ca
Thu Dec 13 00:52:43 UTC 2012


On Thu, 13 Dec 2012, Martin Jansa wrote:

> On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 07:10:46PM -0500, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> >
> >   just noticed that in all of the layers i have checked out (about a
> > dozen), the usage of the deprecated "pnum=" is down to:
> >
> > meta-openembedded/meta-oe/recipes-support/vim/vim_7.2.446.bb:SRC_URI += "http://ftp.vim.org/pub/vim/patches/7.2/7.2.001-100.gz;name=p001-100;apply=yes;patchdir=..;pnum=0"
> > meta-openembedded/meta-oe/recipes-support/vim/vim_7.2.446.bb:SRC_URI += "http://ftp.vim.org/pub/vim/patches/7.2/7.2.101-200.gz;name=p101-200;apply=yes;patchdir=..;pnum=0"
> > meta-openembedded/meta-oe/recipes-support/vim/vim_7.2.446.bb:SRC_URI += "http://ftp.vim.org/pub/vim/patches/7.2/7.2.201-300.gz;name=p201-300;apply=yes;patchdir=..;pnum=0"
> > meta-openembedded/meta-oe/recipes-support/vim/vim_7.2.446.bb:SRC_URI += "http://ftp.vim.org/pub/vim/patches/7.2/7.2.301-400.gz;name=p301-400;apply=yes;patchdir=..;pnum=0"
> > meta-openembedded/meta-oe/recipes-support/vim/vim_7.2.446.bb:SRC_URI += "file://401-446.diff;patchdir=..;pnum=0"
> >
> >   given that that's a single recipe, what about fixing that recipe,
>
> Good plan, please send patch.

  while i'm at it, can i just ditch the "apply=yes"?  isn't that the
default?

rday

-- 

========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day                                 Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA
                        http://crashcourse.ca

Twitter:                                       http://twitter.com/rpjday
LinkedIn:                               http://ca.linkedin.com/in/rpjday
========================================================================




More information about the Openembedded-core mailing list