[OE-core] OK to drop reference to "udev-extra-rules" from udev-extraconf_1.0.bb?

[Martin Jansa]

On Sun, Dec 23, 2012 at 09:50:18AM -0600, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> 
>   it would seem that this from udev-extraconf_1.0.bb:
> 
> # to replace udev-extra-rules from meta-oe
> RPROVIDES_${PN} = "udev-extra-rules"
> RREPLACES_${PN} = "udev-extra-rules"
> RCONFLICTS_${PN} = "udev-extra-rules"
> 
> is now superfluous since udev-extra-rules was tossed from meta-oe some
> months ago?  OK to submit a patch to just take it out?  unless someone
> wants to do it, i'm good either way.

No keep it, you don't know how long it will take for _all_ users to
upgrade on target.

Cheers,

-- 
Martin 'JaMa' Jansa     jabber: Martin.Jansa at gmail.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/attachments/20121223/785c8911/attachment-0002.sig>