[OE-core] [yocto] [pull-sys940x 2/4] ranpwd: Add ranpwd recipe

[Koen Kooi]

Op 7 feb. 2012, om 08:06 heeft Martin Jansa het volgende geschreven:

> On Mon, Feb 06, 2012 at 03:59:36PM -0800, Joshua Lock wrote:
>> On 06/02/12 08:17, Paul Eggleton wrote:
>>> On Thursday 02 February 2012 13:11:19 Joshua Lock wrote:
>>>> Apologies. I'm wrong here. It was PRIORITY which we agreed to drop.
>>> 
>>> It's worth noting however, at the same time PRIORITY removal was discussed it
>>> was acknowledged that SECTION was questionable. Logical grouping of
>>> recipes/packages is a useful thing but coming up with groupings that are
>>> meaningful in all contexts is hard :(
>> 
>> Glad to know my recollection isn't wildly off the mark.
>> 
>> I noticed that there are similar, yet different, SECTION values being 
>> used. If we opt to keep SECTION I wonder if we should try and 
>> standardise/sanitise it?
> 
> If there is standardised SECTION variable why not use
> recipes-${SECTION}/foo_1.0.bb as we already have couple of recipe-*
> directories and it's sometimes hard to decide to which directory
> something belongs.
> 
> Or other way around, standartise recipes-* directories and let bitbake
> decide SECTION from it (like it does for PV and PN).

Can we move this discussion to the oe-core list please?