[OE-core] [PATCH 0/1] A script to clean obsolete sstate cache files

[Otavio Salvador]

On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 14:09, Richard Purdie
<richard.purdie at linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-02-22 at 13:56 -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 13:53, Paul Eggleton
>> <paul.eggleton at linux.intel.com> wrote:
>> > Except here we are talking about a single patch that adds a single file, which
>> > is easily downloadable from the web interface. If it were more complicated I
>> > could understand the fuss, but right now this is almost ridiculous.
>>
>> It doesn't seem that easy; it seems Koen tried to apply it and it has failed.
>>
>> Besides, Robert didn't complain about people asking it to be resend.
>> Who is complaining is Richard and I am just justifying the reasoning
>> why it is more the logical to expect it to be done based on OE-Core.
>
> In this case, Richard is presenting the viewpoint he's heard expressed
> by a number of people in private but who don't want to rock the boat on
> the mailing list. I'd like to see the mailing list be a friendly place
> where people don't get flamed for posting patches. Some of the recent
> responses are less than friendly and I think its reasonable to try and
> resolve this.
>
> I'm going to propose that if trees are poky based, the pull request
> should indicate this. People can then act accordingly. No indication
> means its oe-core derived.

If you look at *my* first reply to this thread I just asked him to
resend it based on OE-Core - as he already did - so I could give it a
test. This seemed quite friendly from my POV and he didn't complain.

If people dislike it, it is better if they show up and don't hide behind you.

-- 
Otavio Salvador                             O.S. Systems
E-mail: otavio at ossystems.com.br  http://www.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854              http://projetos.ossystems.com.br