[OE-core] [RFC v2] package.bbclass: enable the use of package_qa_handle_error
Saul Wold
sgw at linux.intel.com
Tue Jul 3 00:40:37 UTC 2012
This will allow the reporting of these errors as either WARNINGs (default)
or ERRORs if installed_vs_shipped is added to the ERROR_QA of the policy
file (such as a <distro_name>.conf file.
V2: found the code I had intended to send instead of that other junk,
was just not watching what I pushed on that one, sorry. (this is edit in
no in the actual commit message)
Signed-off-by: Saul Wold <sgw at linux.intel.com>
---
meta/classes/package.bbclass | 11 ++++++++---
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/meta/classes/package.bbclass b/meta/classes/package.bbclass
index 0b98c6b..ff2ec96 100644
--- a/meta/classes/package.bbclass
+++ b/meta/classes/package.bbclass
@@ -988,9 +988,14 @@ python populate_packages () {
unshipped.append(path)
if unshipped != []:
- bb.warn("For recipe %s, the following files/directories were installed but not shipped in any package:" % pn)
- for f in unshipped:
- bb.warn(" " + f)
+ msg = pn + ": Files/directories were installed but not shipped"
+ skip = (d.getVar('INSANE_SKIP_' + pn, True) or "").split()
+ if "installed_vs_shipped" in skip:
+ bb.note("Package %s skipping QA tests: installed_vs_shipped" % pn)
+ else:
+ package_qa_handle_error("installed_vs_shipped", msg, d)
+ for f in unshipped:
+ package_qa_handle_error("installed_vs_shipped", " " + f, d)
bb.build.exec_func("package_name_hook", d)
--
1.7.10.4
More information about the Openembedded-core
mailing list