[OE-core] [PATCH 2/2] lsbinitscripts: Add a linking for functions.lsbinitscripts

[Kang Kai]

On 2012年07月07日 08:43, Saul Wold wrote:
> On 06/28/2012 02:35 AM, Kang Kai wrote:
>> From: Xiaofeng Yan <xiaofeng.yan at windriver.com>
>>
>> Increase ALTERNATIVE_PRIORITY of functions to be higher than the
>> value of package initscript. When lsbinitscripts installed, file
>> functions provided by lsbinitscripts will be used.
>>
>> [YOCTO #2133]
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Xiaofeng Yan <xiaofeng.yan at windriver.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Kang Kai <kai.kang at windriver.com>
>> ---
>> meta/recipes-extended/lsb/lsbinitscripts_9.03.bb | 6 +++---
>> 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/meta/recipes-extended/lsb/lsbinitscripts_9.03.bb 
>> b/meta/recipes-extended/lsb/lsbinitscripts_9.03.bb
>> index dd92a92..f324994 100644
>> --- a/meta/recipes-extended/lsb/lsbinitscripts_9.03.bb
>> +++ b/meta/recipes-extended/lsb/lsbinitscripts_9.03.bb
>> @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ DESCRIPTION = "SysV init scripts which only is used 
>> in an LSB image"
>> SECTION = "base"
>> LICENSE = "GPLv2"
>> DEPENDS = "popt"
>> -PR = "r0"
>> +PR = "r1"
>>
>> LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://COPYING;md5=ebf4e8b49780ab187d51bd26aaa022c6"
>>
>> @@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ SRC_URI[md5sum] = "668fa2762b57ef75436303857847bba3"
>> SRC_URI[sha256sum] = 
>> "d56547a68ce223a7413b2676650b042125f047c8d6d139c5b970e118b3dc958a"
>> inherit update-alternatives
>>
>> -ALTERNATIVE_PRIORITY = "10"
>> +ALTERNATIVE_PRIORITY = "100"
>> ALTERNATIVE_${PN} = "functions"
>> ALTERNATIVE_LINK_NAME[functions] = "${sysconfdir}/init.d/functions"
>>
>> @@ -23,5 +23,5 @@ do_configure[noexec] = "1"
>>
>> do_install(){
>> install -d ${D}/etc/init.d/
>> - install -m 0755 ${S}/rc.d/init.d/functions ${D}/etc/init.d/functions
>> + install -m 0755 ${S}/rc.d/init.d/functions 
>> ${D}/etc/init.d/functions.${BPN}
>> }
>>
> As Richard already pointed out, this rename during install is not 
> needed, it happens automagically via the update-alternatives bbclass, 
> this is true with the initscripts recipe also, please fix these two 
> issues and we can move forward with this patch.
Saul,

Thanks. I'll update them.

Regards,
Kai

>
> Thanks
> Sau!
>
>