[OE-core] more pedantry -- looking to clarify layers definition, BBPATH, BBFILES, etc.
Martin Jansa
martin.jansa at gmail.com
Mon Jul 9 09:23:32 UTC 2012
On Sun, Jul 08, 2012 at 01:59:48PM -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
>
> (most of this is sort of self-evident but it's not documented as
> well as it could be so i just want to make sure i have it exactly
> right.)
>
> snippets of some layer.conf files:
>
> oe-core:
>
> BBPATH .= ":${LAYERDIR}"
> BBFILES += "${LAYERDIR}/recipes-*/*/*.bb"
>
> meta-hob:
>
> BBPATH := "${BBPATH}:${LAYERDIR}"
> BBFILES := "${BBFILES} ${LAYERDIR}/recipes-*/*/*.bb"
>
> meta-yocto:
>
> BBPATH := "${LAYERDIR}:${BBPATH}"
> BBFILES := "${BBFILES} ${LAYERDIR}/recipes-*/*/*.bb \
> ${LAYERDIR}/recipes-*/*/*.bbappend"
>
> note how meta-hob *appends* itself to BBPATH, while meta-yocto
> *prepends* itself. is there no possibility that this will cause some
> confusion based on how BBPATH is used to resolve the location of class
> or conf files? i realize you should try to avoid that sort of
> conflict but it still seems possible that someone might choose the
> names of some files badly and the unpredictable ordering in BBPATH
> will cause grief, no?
Yes, order is important and prepending makes it harder for person
writting bblayers.conf to influence it:
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/2012-July/024914.html
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/2012-February/018115.html:
BBFILE_PRIORITY controls recipe priority. BBLAYERS order controls
BBPATH order which in turn controls bbclass/config priority, as things
stand today.
See also this thread for more details:
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/pipermail/openembedded-devel/2011-May/032387.html
Cheers,
--
Martin 'JaMa' Jansa jabber: Martin.Jansa at gmail.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/attachments/20120709/c26862df/attachment-0002.sig>
More information about the Openembedded-core
mailing list