[OE-core] [PATCH 0/3] perf-scripting/perf-tui features, v2

[Bruce Ashfield]

On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 9:47 AM, Tom Zanussi <tom.zanussi at intel.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-07-09 at 00:55 -0700, Saul Wold wrote:
>> On 07/07/2012 10:18 PM, Tom Zanussi wrote:
>> > On Fri, 2012-07-06 at 15:29 -0500, tom.zanussi at intel.com wrote:
>> >> From: Tom Zanussi <tom.zanussi at intel.com>
>> >>
>> >> This patchset adds perf-scriping and perf-tui features as
>> >> a per-arch thing rather than per-machine, as suggested by
>> >> Richard Purdie.
>> >>
>> >> I just started testing this, it works so far, but thought
>> >> I'd put it out there now in case there were comments before
>> >> putting too much effort into that, and possibly giving other
>> >> people a chance to try it out.
>> >>
>> >
>> > Looks fine after more build-testing: qemux86, qemux86-64, crownbay,
>> > sugarbay, qemuarm and qemuppc both with and without perf-scripting and
>> > perf-tui, and builds without perf as well all build fine here.
>> >
>> Tom, I am sorry, I am not sure how else to say this, I have tested
>> master with the only the following change and I am still getting the
>> the setup.py failure mentioned.
>>
>> I am not sure what else to suspect at this point, this is Master plus 3
>> commits, please help me understand where I have gone wrong.
>>
>> This is the branch I have tested, which is 3 commits pasted Master:
>>
>> http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/poky-contrib/log/?h=sgw/fail
>>
>
> Saul,
>
> It's because your kernel hasn't advanced the SRCREVs to include the new
> commits - the above patches won't work without the associated kernel
> changes.  So if you're build-testing qemux86-64 for instance, you'd want
> to change the following line in linux_yocto_3.4.bb from:
>
> SRCREV_machine_qemux86-64 ?= "d345461f0d52d1a82553c2edd845a8bee908923f"
>
> to include the last commit of the associated kernel patch series i.e.the
> top of the common-pc-64 branch:
>
> SRCREV_machine_qemux86-64 ?= "49f1599b2ce0288599805b5364b895f5a9febb3e"

.. and I'm about to send a new set of SRCREVs that have this and
some more. I was just waiting to see how these conversations played out.

Cheers,

Bruce

>
> That should get the kernel changes associated with the patchset into
> your kernel and everything should build nicely...
>
> Tom
>
>> Thanks
>>       Sau!
>>
>> > Tom
>> >
>> >> The following changes since commit 5051e9837fa698e03d0a7a8a918ee7aa98409ce1:
>> >>    Robert P. J. Day (1):
>> >>          bitbake: usermanual: Fix missing markup
>> >>
>> >> are available in the git repository at:
>> >>
>> >>    git://git.yoctoproject.org/poky-contrib.git tzanussi/perf-scripting-v2
>> >>    http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/poky-contrib/log/?h=tzanussi/perf-scripting-v2
>> >>
>> >> Tom Zanussi (3):
>> >>    perf: add perf.inc
>> >>    perf: add arch-specific perf-scripting feature
>> >>    perf: add arch-specific perf-tui feature
>> >>
>> >>   meta/recipes-kernel/perf/perf.inc    |   30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> >>   meta/recipes-kernel/perf/perf_3.4.bb |   18 +++++++++++++++---
>> >>   2 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>> >>   create mode 100644 meta/recipes-kernel/perf/perf.inc
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Openembedded-core mailing list
>> > Openembedded-core at lists.openembedded.org
>> > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
>> >
>> >
>>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-core mailing list
> Openembedded-core at lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core



-- 
"Thou shalt not follow the NULL pointer, for chaos and madness await
thee at its end"