[OE-core] [PATCH] udev-extraconf: change LICENSE to MIT
Martin Jansa
martin.jansa at gmail.com
Tue Jul 31 11:37:17 UTC 2012
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 12:26:50PM +0100, Richard Purdie wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-07-30 at 21:01 +0200, Martin Jansa wrote:
> > * original recipe added by RP in fc128ab1e4fec27d44cebfa690a9bc233eda0caf was saying GPL
> > * later it was changed to GPLv2
> > * COPYING.GPL was added to reflect that
> > * meta-oe has similar recipe with MIT license and even more scripts, so lets change LICENSE here too
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Martin Jansa <Martin.Jansa at gmail.com>
> > ---
> > meta/recipes-core/udev/udev-extraconf/COPYING.GPL | 339 ---------------------
> > meta/recipes-core/udev/udev-extraconf_1.0.bb | 8 +-
> > 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 343 deletions(-)
> > delete mode 100644 meta/recipes-core/udev/udev-extraconf/COPYING.GPL
>
> Er, I think we need to be a little more careful than this. Just because
> you want something to be so, doesn't make it happen just like that...
>
> Looking at the commit, I've just copied the license from the original
> source which was a GPLv2 recipe (udev). Where did mount.blacklist come
> from originally? Is there evidence its MIT licensed? How did meta-oe
> conclude this was MIT licensed?
sorry I'm not lawyer to decide if those 3 lines of code should be GPLv2
or MIT and I don't have any evidence either way.. (From common sense
more lines were imported from meta-oe where they were marked as MIT).
I think I was carefull, first warning in commit message (end kept
original LICENSE) then extra patch on Koen's request to be clear
about that change.
Do we want 2 licenses in udev-extraconf or should we ask all devs which
ever touched udev-extra-rules for permission to change it to GPLv2?
Cheers,
--
Martin 'JaMa' Jansa jabber: Martin.Jansa at gmail.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/attachments/20120731/a86e3b50/attachment-0002.sig>
More information about the Openembedded-core
mailing list