[OE-core] [PATCH 1/1] busybox: Include setsid and cttyhack in defconfig

[Darren Hart]

On 06/16/2012 09:18 AM, Phil Blundell wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-06-15 at 15:56 -0700, Darren Hart wrote:
>> So the delta for including SETSID and CTTYHACK is 2560 bytes.
> 
> Personally I am still not in favour of adding this to the default
> configuration.  I appreciate that it's "only" 2.5k in this case, but
> every time we make a change like this the binary gets a little bit
> bigger and, over time, it does add up.  This sort of gradual bloat is
> quite insidious and difficult to combat after the fact.
> 
> So, I continue to think that poky-tiny should just provide its own
> busybox configuration and turn on the options that it wants just like
> other DISTROs do.  No doubt there are some things currently included in
> the oe-core defaults that poky-tiny doesn't need, so you would probably
> get a smaller binary that way as well.

You are correct that poky-tiny would benefit from a smaller config. My
original intent was to update the busybox recipe to use the new
merge-config.sh that we pushed to the upstream Linux kernel (which
should work with busybox as it uses the same config mechanism). This
would allow us to maintain a base busybox config with a several config
fragments that can be easily added via DISTRO_FEATURES rather than the
complicated hack that is in busybox now for handling DISTRO_FEATURES. I
prefer this approach as it reduces (if not eliminates) the need for the
proliferation of busybox.bbappend files.

However, this is a larger project and my immediate goal is to get
poky-tiny into better shape in terms of the initial experience. This is
why I originally implemented it as a "tiny" DISTRO_FEATURE as that would
migrate naturally to the config fragment approach. You and others
objected to that approach, and I do understand not wanting to complicate
the DISTRO_FEATURE logic further.

With the above goal in mind, can you accept either of my proposed
patches as an interim solution? Either as an added tiny DISTRO_FEATURE
or as a simple addition to the defconfig? I do believe these two
features are useful beyond poky-tiny.



-- 
Darren Hart
Intel Open Source Technology Center
Yocto Project - Linux Kernel