[OE-core] [PATCH 1/1] busybox: Include setsid and cttyhack in defconfig

Koen Kooi koen at dominion.thruhere.net
Mon Jun 18 05:00:19 UTC 2012



Op 17 jun. 2012 om 23:14 heeft Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton at linux.intel.com> het volgende geschreven:

> On Saturday 16 June 2012 21:41:53 Koen Kooi wrote:
>> Op 16 jun. 2012, om 16:47 heeft Darren Hart het volgende geschreven:
>>> Note that poky-tiny is not currently in its own layer, but is included
>>> in the meta-intel layer. I will look into ways to accomplish this
>>> without adding to the core busybox config and not having to break out
>>> poky-tiny into its own layer.
>> 
>> What is it with you intel folks (bless their hearts) wanting to combine BSP
>> and distro? baerion, guacamayo and poky-tiny all force you to include the
>> distro stuff if you want any of their recipes. I don't want to have all the
>> hostnames on my boards changed to 'baerion' when I build mediatomb!
> 
> All of these efforts are separate and put together by different people.
> 
> Firstly, I think when Darren said "meta-intel" he meant to say "meta-yocto" 
> which is where the poky-tiny distro config can be found (and indeed that is 
> where I would expect to find it).
> 
> Secondly, you already asked me about Baryon and I already agreed that it 
> needed reorganising and promised to do it; but I haven't had time yet. I'd 
> also point out in any case that it does not contain any BSP and the mere 
> presence of the baryon distro config does not force you to use it as you 
> suggest.

it does force the distro bbappends onto everyone, messing up /etc/hostname



> 
> Paul
> 
> -- 
> 
> Paul Eggleton
> Intel Open Source Technology Centre




More information about the Openembedded-core mailing list