[OE-core] [PATCH 2/7] tclibc-eglibc.inc: Define USE_NLS

[Richard Purdie]

On Tue, 2012-06-26 at 23:09 -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
> USE_NLS is generally defined for uclibc based system builds
> and generally its defined to 'no' there. However this variable
> does not exist at all for eglibc/glibc distributions. This
> patch adds a weak definition to 'yes' on eglibc based system
> builds. This will ease out some of the cryptic contructs we
> have to define certain options based on USE_NLS and also
> checking got uclibc at the same time to avoid pythong exceptions
> when its not defined.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <raj.khem at gmail.com>
> ---
>  meta/conf/distro/include/tclibc-eglibc.inc |    2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/meta/conf/distro/include/tclibc-eglibc.inc b/meta/conf/distro/include/tclibc-eglibc.inc
> index 4f5607f..e2ca4e8 100644
> --- a/meta/conf/distro/include/tclibc-eglibc.inc
> +++ b/meta/conf/distro/include/tclibc-eglibc.inc
> @@ -32,6 +32,8 @@ LIBC_LOCALE_DEPENDENCIES = "\
>  	eglibc-gconv-iso8859-1 \
>  	eglibc-gconv-iso8859-15"
>  
> +USE_NLS ?= "yes"
> +
>  def get_libc_locales_dependencies(d):
>      if 'libc-locales' in (d.getVar('DISTRO_FEATURES', True) or '').split() :
>          return d.getVar('LIBC_LOCALE_DEPENDENCIES', True) or ''

Shouldn't this go as a weak default in bitbake.conf?

USE_NLS ??= "yes"

Cheers,

Richard