[OE-core] [PATCH 3/4] kernel: Add kernel-headers package for target module build

[Khem Raj]

On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 11:14 PM, Darren Hart <dvhart at linux.intel.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 06/28/2012 11:04 PM, Khem Raj wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 10:50 PM, Darren Hart <dvhart at linux.intel.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> However, I don't have a strong opinion here, I'll happily call it
>>> kernel-devel if that is strongly preferred by some.
>>
>> in oe terminology it will be -dev
>
> THe other reason I didn't go that route is that we already have a
> kernel-dev (although I don't much like the way it is used):
>
> From kernel.bbclass:
>
> PACKAGES = "kernel kernel-base kernel-vmlinux kernel-image kernel-dev \
>            kernel-misc kernel-headers"
> FILES = ""
> FILES_kernel-image = "/boot/${KERNEL_IMAGETYPE}*"
> FILES_kernel-dev = "/boot/System.map* /boot/Module.symvers* /boot/config*"
> FILES_kernel-vmlinux = "/boot/vmlinux*"
> # misc is a package to contain files we need in staging
> FILES_kernel-misc = "/kernel/include/config /kernel/scripts
> /kernel/drivers/crypto /kernel/drivers/media"
> FILES_kernel-headers = "/usr/src/kernel-headers"
>
> And looking at that it appears I broke kernel-misc by moving things to
> /usr/src (didn't notice that in my testing).
>
> How would you propose we redefine the above in order to use "kernel-dev"
> for the new package?

hmmm interesting so I guess, linux-dev being already taken, you might
call it linux-kernel-headers as you were doing. So we have
linux-libc-headers and linux-kernel-headers to differentiate between
raw and sanitized headers

>
> --
> Darren Hart
> Intel Open Source Technology Center
> Yocto Project - Linux Kernel
>
>