[OE-core] [PATCH 7/8] gcc: remove the 64bithack patch
Kamble, Nitin A
nitin.a.kamble at intel.com
Thu Mar 15 16:03:42 UTC 2012
> -----Original Message-----
> From: openembedded-core-bounces at lists.openembedded.org
> [mailto:openembedded-core-bounces at lists.openembedded.org] On Behalf Of
> Richard Purdie
> Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2012 1:31 AM
> To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
> Subject: Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 7/8] gcc: remove the 64bithack patch
>
> On Wed, 2012-03-14 at 19:02 -0700, nitin.a.kamble at intel.com wrote:
> > From: Nitin A Kamble <nitin.a.kamble at intel.com>
> >
> > and bump PR
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Nitin A Kamble <nitin.a.kamble at intel.com>
> > ---
> > meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-4.6.inc | 1 -
> > meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-4.6/64bithack.patch | 68 -----------
> ----------
> > 2 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 69 deletions(-)
> > delete mode 100644 meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-4.6/64bithack.patch
>
>
> As far as I can tell whilst this will make multilib work on the target
> device, since you've removed this patch, the actual -cross toolchains
> used for multilib builds will be broken since they may or may not look
> in the correct libdir?
>
> Cheers,
>
> Richard
>
Hi Richard,
This is not an issue. do_gcc_multilib_setup() is always configuring the gcc multilib files. For cross gcc recipes it is only using DEFAULTTUNE while for target it is using DEFAULTTUNE & MULTILIB_VARIENTS. Also in my testing cross gcc recipes did not have any such issues.
Thanks,
Nitin
More information about the Openembedded-core
mailing list