[OE-core] [PATCH 7/8] gcc: remove the 64bithack patch

Kamble, Nitin A nitin.a.kamble at intel.com
Thu Mar 15 16:03:42 UTC 2012



> -----Original Message-----
> From: openembedded-core-bounces at lists.openembedded.org
> [mailto:openembedded-core-bounces at lists.openembedded.org] On Behalf Of
> Richard Purdie
> Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2012 1:31 AM
> To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
> Subject: Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 7/8] gcc: remove the 64bithack patch
> 
> On Wed, 2012-03-14 at 19:02 -0700, nitin.a.kamble at intel.com wrote:
> > From: Nitin A Kamble <nitin.a.kamble at intel.com>
> >
> > and bump PR
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Nitin A Kamble <nitin.a.kamble at intel.com>
> > ---
> >  meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-4.6.inc             |    1 -
> >  meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-4.6/64bithack.patch |   68 -----------
> ----------
> >  2 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 69 deletions(-)
> >  delete mode 100644 meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-4.6/64bithack.patch
> 
> 
> As far as I can tell whilst this will make multilib work on the target
> device, since you've removed this patch, the actual -cross toolchains
> used for multilib builds will be broken since they may or may not look
> in the correct libdir?
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Richard
> 

Hi Richard,
  This is not an issue. do_gcc_multilib_setup() is always configuring the gcc multilib files. For cross gcc recipes it is only using DEFAULTTUNE while for target it is using DEFAULTTUNE & MULTILIB_VARIENTS. Also in my testing cross gcc recipes did not have any such issues.

Thanks,
Nitin





More information about the Openembedded-core mailing list