[OE-core] [PATCH 2/7] archiver.bbclass: New bbclass for archiving sources, patches, logs and scripts

Xiaofeng Yan xiaofeng.yan at windriver.com
Tue Mar 20 09:49:52 UTC 2012


On 2012年03月20日 17:40, Xiaofeng Yan wrote:
> On 2012年03月20日 16:07, Koen Kooi wrote:
>> Op 20 mrt. 2012, om 06:50 heeft Xiaofeng Yan het volgende geschreven:
>>
>>> On 2012年03月20日 05:04, Saul Wold wrote:
>>>> On 03/15/2012 11:23 PM, Xiaofeng Yan wrote:
>>>>> From: Xiaofeng Yan<xiaofeng.yan at windriver.com>
>>>>>
>>>> Why do you rebuild the tarball here are rename it instead of just 
>>>> copying the original tarball?
>>>>
>>> because many packages come from non-tarball and they could be git 
>>> sources , So I archive these sources after do_unpack.
>> But if you have the original tarball and reuse it, you'll get the 
>> warm fuzzy feeling of matching checksums.
> So How about  renaming archive-original-source to 
> archive-prepatched-source?
Hi Saul,

Or I can add a new functions to get tarball from downloads if have 
tarball and archive source codes directory if have directory without 
tarball.
Do you think it is necessary for us to add this function?

Thanks
Yan
>> regards,
>>
>> Koen
>> _______________________________________________
>> Openembedded-core mailing list
>> Openembedded-core at lists.openembedded.org
>> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-core mailing list
> Openembedded-core at lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core





More information about the Openembedded-core mailing list