[OE-core] [PATCH 1/2] eglibc-2.15: Update SRCREV

[Martin Jansa]

On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 07:15:32AM -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 7:26 PM, Martin Jansa <martin.jansa at gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 02:17:02PM +0100, Martin Jansa wrote:
> >> On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 12:05:25PM +0000, Richard Purdie wrote:
> >> > On Thu, 2012-03-22 at 19:56 -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
> >> > > Get new patches and remove the one that got merged upstream
> >> > >
> >> > > Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <raj.khem at gmail.com>
> >> > > ---
> >> > >  .../eglibc/eglibc-2.15/GLRO_dl_debug_mask.patch    |  108 ++++++++++++++++++++
> >> > >  .../eglibc-2.15/armv4-eabi-compile-fix.patch       |   25 -----
> >> > >  .../eglibc/eglibc-2.15/initgroups_keys.patch       |   20 ++++
> >> > >  meta/recipes-core/eglibc/eglibc_2.15.bb            |    5 +-
> >> > >  4 files changed, 131 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
> >> > >  create mode 100644 meta/recipes-core/eglibc/eglibc-2.15/GLRO_dl_debug_mask.patch
> >> > >  delete mode 100644 meta/recipes-core/eglibc/eglibc-2.15/armv4-eabi-compile-fix.patch
> >> > >  create mode 100644 meta/recipes-core/eglibc/eglibc-2.15/initgroups_keys.patch
> >> >
> >> > Since 2.15 isn't the default I'm tempted to merge this despite the point
> >> > we're at in the release cycle. I'd like to give anyone using this the
> >> > opportunity to comment first though.
> >>
> >> I'm testing this on all archs I'm using (armv4t, armv5te, armv7a,
> >> x86-64) and will report tomorrow.
> >
> > Doesn't look related to this change, but I got interesing error on other
> > buildhost (on mine everything seems fine sofar including tests on
> > target), I don't have log from armv4t build on mine, because it's on tmpfs
> > and there was unexpected reboot when I wasn't home :/.
> 
> Hi Martin
> 
> Does it look good for your testing ?

Seems fine in runtime any hint about that build issue?

Today I got another one :/

"build-x86_64-oe-linux/shlib.lds:127: syntax error
while building eglibc

I had reports about this before, but wasn't able to reproduce it on my
machine, today I got it for first time (maybe because of building with
-j8 instead of -j4), so I've created simple testcase to compare interim 
outputs from shlib.lds creation:
http://build.shr-project.org/tests/jama/shlib-issue/

Cheers,
-- 
Martin 'JaMa' Jansa     jabber: Martin.Jansa at gmail.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/attachments/20120328/594058fe/attachment-0002.sig>