[OE-core] [PATCH 3/3] powerpc: define TUNE_PKGARCH for powerpc/powerpc-nf

McClintock Matthew-B29882 B29882 at freescale.com
Thu Mar 29 18:50:12 UTC 2012


On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 1:38 PM, Chris Larson <clarson at kergoth.com> wrote:
>> Does the above seem reasonable?  If so I'll try to get started on that...
>
> That seems reasonable to me, for what that's worth. I could see
> simplifying the way the powerpc stuff works in the future, but at
> least we'd have something functional for now as well. It keeps primary
> responsibility for TUNE_PKGARCH in arch-powerpc*.inc, which is as it
> should be -- the arch knows best how to manage it. I'm curious to hear
> Matthew's perspective on this.

This is fine with me, I just did not like setting

TUNE_FEATURES = foo

only to have

TUNE_ARCH  = ${@bb.utils.contains("TUNE_FEATURES", "foo", "foo",
"${PPCPKGARCH}", d)}"

when it seemed better to just

TUNE_ARCH = foo

At least I think that was my thought logic, then it went a step
further and thought we could just use TUNE_PKGARCH_tune-$DEFAULTTUNE
since these would be available from multilib anyways...

-M




More information about the Openembedded-core mailing list