[OE-core] argh ... "_append" versus "+=" and IMAGE_INSTALL confusion
Paul Eggleton
paul.eggleton at linux.intel.com
Thu Mar 29 20:42:08 UTC 2012
On Thursday 29 March 2012 15:35:10 Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> On Thu, 29 Mar 2012, Eric Bénard wrote:
> > Le Thu, 29 Mar 2012 15:23:20 -0400 (EDT),
> >
> > "Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday at crashcourse.ca> a écrit :
> > > so what is best practise here?
> >
> > for this one you have an answer on OE's wiki :
> > http://www.openembedded.org/wiki/I_want_an_image_with_package_XYZ_installe
> > d
>
> despite the fact that the current reference manual *explicitly*
> says this?
>
> "Using IMAGE_INSTALL with the += operator from the /conf/local.conf
> file or from within an image recipe is not recommended as it can cause
> ordering issues."
I think what the manual is attempting to mitigate is a situation where you do
the following in your image recipe:
-------- snip -------
IMAGE_INSTALL += "somepackage1 somepackage2"
inherit core-image
-------- snip -------
In this instance, because IMAGE_INSTALL is set via ?= within core-
image.bbclass, IMAGE_INSTALL will only be set to "somepackage1 somepackage2"
since the value is already set by the time it gets to the ?=. This is clearly
not what you would want by using +=.
Doing the following in an image recipe will work properly however:
-------- snip -------
inherit core-image
IMAGE_INSTALL += "somepackage1 somepackage2"
-------- snip -------
Personally I think the text you quoted from the manual should be adjusted;
there's nothing wrong with IMAGE_INSTALL += _in an image recipe_ provided that
you do it _after_ the inherit of core-image.
Cheers,
Paul
--
Paul Eggleton
Intel Open Source Technology Centre
More information about the Openembedded-core
mailing list