[OE-core] [PATCH 0/6] Setup for VMDK to use Direct Disk
Cui, Dexuan
dexuan.cui at intel.com
Sat Mar 31 05:11:41 UTC 2012
Cui, Dexuan wrote on 2012-03-31:
> Paul Eggleton wrote on 2012-03-30:
>> On Monday 26 March 2012 22:42:54 Saul Wold wrote:
>>> Updated comments per Darren's request, added cleanup to image-types
>>> to only use one -i (inode-count) parameter.
>>>
>>> Sau! The following changes since commit
>>> 644b7503c37fd73730dd3d7841463b158b8934ed:
>>>
>>> guile: Deal with hardcoded path issues (2012-03-27 00:28:41 +0100)
>>> are available in the git repository at:
>>> git://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core-contrib sgw/self
>>> http://cgit.openembedded.org/cgit.cgi/openembedded-core-contrib/log
>>> /
>>> ?h
>>> =sgw/
>>> self
>>
>> So these patches have been merged now; I updated to latest master
>> and re-ran bitbake self-hosted-image; unfortunately the output
>> doesn't appear to be usable. I don't know what has gone wrong but
>> during boot there are complaints that the filesystem is corrupt:
>>
>> SYSLINUX 4.03 2010-10-22 EDD Copyright (C) 1994-2010 H. Peter Anvin et
>> al EXT3-fs error (device hda2): ext3_lookup: deleted inode referenced:
>> 581713 EXT3-fs error (device hda2): ext3_lookup: deleted inode
>> referenced: 610383 Kernel panic - not syncing: no init found. Try
>> passing init= option to kernel.
>>
>> Running e2fsck -fn on the rootfs.ext3 file shows quite a number of errors.
>> There were no unusual errors in the log.do_rootfs.
>>
> Hi Paul,
> I can reproduce the same I issue, too...
> I'll try to look into this, but at the first glance, I don't know what
> has gone wrong, either...
Can we make a conclusion the current genext2fs is buggy here
when creating a big image(e.g., >4GB)?
Thanks,
-- Dexuan
More information about the Openembedded-core
mailing list