[OE-core] [PATCH 0/3] Enable xserver-xorg for all qemumachines

[Saul Wold]

On 05/08/2012 03:18 PM, Khem Raj wrote:
> On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 3:09 PM, Khem Raj<raj.khem at gmail.com>  wrote:
>> On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 3:06 PM, Saul Wold<sgw at linux.intel.com>  wrote:
>>>>
>>> Khem,
>>>
>>> Not sure what I am doing differently, but I am not getting the xserver to
>>> start on at least ppc and mips (two that I tried just now).
>>>
>>> Are you build a Yocto sato image or oe-core sato image?
>>>
>>> I get the following on a ppc:
>>>
>>> Fatal server error:
>>> no screens found
>>> xinit: giving up
>>> xinit: unable to connect to X server: No such file or directory
>>> xinit: server error
>>>
>>
>> hmmm I have booted core-image-sato but I have bare OE-Core
>> Do you have
>>
>>
>> http://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core-contrib/commit/?h=kraj/qemu-xserver-xorg&id=8a60dabb7902b7be42d06cb735e96248e2e67dba
>>
>> is some layer on top changing it in some way ?
>
> hmmm another think I have is this patch
> http://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core-contrib/commit/?h=kraj/misc&id=955dee621361e01627ebfde152f25873070cf301
>
> which deletes kdrive recipes. I did not propose it for inclusion yet
> but I wonder if there is any mix and match happening when these
> recipes are not deleted.
> You can cherry-pick it and see if that helps.
>
So I found that task-core-x11.bb also sets XSERVER

XSERVER ?= "xserver-kdrive-fbdev"

And this was being picked up it seems when I did the build.

I commented that line out and it worked correctly.

That seems wrong, since I thought the ??= should not allow the ?= to 
override, or do I have it backwards?

Sau!




>