[OE-core] [PATCH] Revert "kmod: Use base_libdir for installing libkmod"

Koen Kooi koen at dominion.thruhere.net
Thu May 17 20:44:32 UTC 2012



Op 17 mei 2012 om 22:29 heeft Richard Purdie <richard.purdie at linuxfoundation.org> het volgende geschreven:

> On Tue, 2012-05-15 at 13:54 -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
>> On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 2:32 AM, Koen Kooi <koen at dominion.thruhere.net> wrote:
>>> The commit breaks pkgconfig and after discussing it with the kmod and udev maintainers the conclusion was reached that putting the libraries in /lib instead of /usr/lib is not supported.
>>> 
>>> This reverts commit 6b74f2461735272bd950a4f060dab6e778a36f92.
>> 
>> while this is what I had initially it doesn't go well with kmod living in
>> /sbin and accessing libraries from /usr due to our QA checks although
>> I am all for simplifying it where we don't make this check at all.
> 
> I've had requests for it along with a commitment to fix it and patches.
> If we decide we don't want this, fine and that will be the case if
> patches are not forthcoming to fix the QA issues. I don't think we've
> reached that point at this with that yet.
> 
> I've decided to accept this patch and "unbreak" meta-oe/udev at the
> expense of screwing up OE-Core. I am however still deeply unhappy people
> are trying to bypass OE-Core this way and then "blackmail" OE-Core using
> breaking meta-oe as a reason. The whole systemd thing has been badly
> handled and needs to get fixed properly.

What does systemd have to do with this? This is about a broken commit breaking udev 182 for over a week.
If you have issues with systemd, send patches to meta-oe to fix it. Or at least bug reports that are more than the insinuations above. 




More information about the Openembedded-core mailing list