[OE-core] [PATCH] Revert "kmod: Use base_libdir for installing libkmod"

[Koen Kooi]

Op 17 mei 2012, om 23:02 heeft Richard Purdie het volgende geschreven:

> On Thu, 2012-05-17 at 22:44 +0200, Koen Kooi wrote:
>> Op 17 mei 2012 om 22:29 heeft Richard Purdie <richard.purdie at linuxfoundation.org> het volgende geschreven:
>> 
>>> On Tue, 2012-05-15 at 13:54 -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
>>>> On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 2:32 AM, Koen Kooi <koen at dominion.thruhere.net> wrote:
>>>>> The commit breaks pkgconfig and after discussing it with the kmod and udev maintainers the conclusion was reached that putting the libraries in /lib instead of /usr/lib is not supported.
>>>>> 
>>>>> This reverts commit 6b74f2461735272bd950a4f060dab6e778a36f92.
>>>> 
>>>> while this is what I had initially it doesn't go well with kmod living in
>>>> /sbin and accessing libraries from /usr due to our QA checks although
>>>> I am all for simplifying it where we don't make this check at all.
>>> 
>>> I've had requests for it along with a commitment to fix it and patches.
>>> If we decide we don't want this, fine and that will be the case if
>>> patches are not forthcoming to fix the QA issues. I don't think we've
>>> reached that point at this with that yet.
>>> 
>>> I've decided to accept this patch and "unbreak" meta-oe/udev at the
>>> expense of screwing up OE-Core. I am however still deeply unhappy people
>>> are trying to bypass OE-Core this way and then "blackmail" OE-Core using
>>> breaking meta-oe as a reason. The whole systemd thing has been badly
>>> handled and needs to get fixed properly.
>> 
>> What does systemd have to do with this?
> 
> Why does meta-oe has its own udev recipe?

Because it's too much trouble to get the updated recipe into oe-core

> Is systemd related to that at all?

No

>> This is about a broken commit breaking udev 182 for over a week.
> 
> OE-Core worked fine

So you say that moving the pkgconfig files from /usr/lib to /lib was fine. Good to know.