[OE-core] [PATCH 4/4] scripts: replace os.popen with subprocess.Popen

[Robert Yang]

On 05/30/2012 01:30 AM, Chris Larson wrote:
> On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 7:53 AM, Robert Yang<liezhi.yang at windriver.com>  wrote:
>> Replace os.popen with subprocess.Popen since the older function would
>> fail (more or less) silently if the executed program cannot be found
>>
>> More info:
>> http://docs.python.org/library/subprocess.html#subprocess-replacements
>>
>> [YOCTO #2454]
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Robert Yang<liezhi.yang at windriver.com>
>> ---
>>   scripts/contrib/python/generate-manifest-2.7.py |    3 ++-
>>   1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/scripts/contrib/python/generate-manifest-2.7.py b/scripts/contrib/python/generate-manifest-2.7.py
>> index 7b43137..d139ab1 100755
>> --- a/scripts/contrib/python/generate-manifest-2.7.py
>> +++ b/scripts/contrib/python/generate-manifest-2.7.py
>> @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
>>   import os
>>   import sys
>>   import time
>> +import subprocess
>>
>>   VERSION = "2.7.2"
>>
>> @@ -149,7 +150,7 @@ class MakefileMaker:
>>   if __name__ == "__main__":
>>
>>      if len( sys.argv )>  1:
>> -        os.popen( "rm -f ./%s" % sys.argv[1] )
>> +        subprocess.Popen("rm -f ./%s" % sys.argv[1], shell=True, stdout=subprocess.PIPE).stdout
>>          outfile = file( sys.argv[1], "w" )
>>      else:
>>          outfile = sys.stdout
>
> This seems like a candidate for subprocess.call, not subprocess.Popen,
> as the output isn't used. Better yet, just use os.unlink() and ignore
> exceptions from it.

Thanks, Chris, I will send the V2 sooner.

// Robert