[OE-core] [PATCH] move the benchmark package bonnie++ from meta-oe layer to oe-core and upgrade bonnie++ from 1.03c to 1.03e

[Martin Jansa]

On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 04:16:32PM -0500, Randy MacLeod wrote:
> On 12-11-21 02:59 AM, fupan.li wrote:
> > On 11/21/2012 03:46 PM, Martin Jansa wrote:
> >> On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 10:30:25AM +0800, fupan.li at windriver.com wrote:
> >>> From: fli <fupan.li at windriver.com>
> >> Why do you think that bonnie++ is "core" enough to be in oe-core?
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> > I think it's better to afford those benchmark packages such as lmbench,
> > iozone3, bonnie++ and so on
> > in the oe-core, so that the users can benchmark its built system easily!
> > Benchmark test for an embedded system is essential, especially for those
> > projects based on the OE.
> 
> Right it shouldn't be in oe-core, sorry for suggeting that Fupan.
> What do you suggest Martin? I haven't been following how people
> choose to make a YP layer or add things to meta-oe in OpenEmbedded.
> 
> Should we make meta-benchmark layer for the YP or
> should we try to re-use:
>  
> http://cgit.openembedded.org/meta-openembedded/tree/meta-oe/recipes-benchmark
> 	
> d---------	bonnie
> d---------	cpuburn
> d---------	dbench
> d---------	fio
> d---------	iozone3
> d---------	iperf
> d---------	lmbench
> d---------	memtester
> d---------	nbench-byte
> d---------	netperf
> d---------	tiobench

Yes, using meta-oe is easiest way.

And bonnie is already there, so why to move it.

Cheers,

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/attachments/20121121/a3222aec/attachment-0002.sig>