[OE-core] [PATCH] libtool: Add missing DEPENDS on libtool-cross

Richard Purdie richard.purdie at linuxfoundation.org
Thu Oct 4 14:29:44 UTC 2012


On Thu, 2012-10-04 at 14:06 +0000, Maupin, Chase wrote:
> I tried the following to help narrow this down.  Please let me know if there is something else I could try to help narrow the issue.  I ran:
> 
> bitbake -c cleanall libtool
> bitbake libtool
> 
> Each time it failed I would get a list of the contents of the work directory and the stamps directory.  My goal here was to be able to find what changed between a pass and a fail.  I kept running the test above until I had a consistent failure, and there were no new packages being added into my work directory and no new stamps being created.  Basically this told me that all the packages that were going to be built from doing "bitbake libtool" were built and that the only package being built was libtool itself.
> 
> I then changed my build steps to do:
> 
> bitbake -c cleanall libtool
> bitbake libtool-cross
> bitbake libtool
> 
> This passed on the first run.  I captured the same work directory contents and stamps contents and then did a diff to see what had changed between these builds.  The diffs were:
> 
> For Stamps diff libtool-failed-stamps libtool-passed-stamps
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> /arago-tmp-eglibc/stamps$ diff -burpN libtool-failed-stamps libtool-passed-stamps 
> --- libtool-failed-stamps	2012-10-04 09:11:27.909881710 -0500
> +++ libtool-passed-stamps	2012-10-04 09:14:33.997328844 -0500
> @@ -23,18 +23,56 @@ external-arago-toolchain-1.0-r2.do_popul
>  external-arago-toolchain-1.0-r2.do_populate_sysroot.sigdata.bccac35b2b6fecd3cbec49ccc208c6a9
>  external-arago-toolchain-1.0-r2.do_unpack
>  external-arago-toolchain-1.0-r2.do_unpack.sigdata.14d8090b51a447ceb4ccf44941781e47
> +libtool-2.4.2-r3.0.do_build
>  libtool-2.4.2-r3.0.do_cleansstate
>  libtool-2.4.2-r3.0.do_cleansstate.sigdata.e2a5d5c89e3be41823e835c18b50dfa3
> +libtool-2.4.2-r3.0.do_compile
> +libtool-2.4.2-r3.0.do_compile.sigdata.ea5125c6ecc524aed598dba3b731d92d
> +libtool-2.4.2-r3.0.do_configure
> +libtool-2.4.2-r3.0.do_configure.sigdata.2e462cacc7c699c75bce74bb7dcf55f4
>  libtool-2.4.2-r3.0.do_create_srcipk
>  libtool-2.4.2-r3.0.do_create_srcipk.sigdata.caa56f6b8b195ff4e6a063f1288c5f86
>  libtool-2.4.2-r3.0.do_fetch
>  libtool-2.4.2-r3.0.do_fetch.sigdata.0ccdbfe0aace02237038ae0203de9060
> +libtool-2.4.2-r3.0.do_install
> +libtool-2.4.2-r3.0.do_install.sigdata.9ad203ae762fe0556e7a991ab8a7707c
> +libtool-2.4.2-r3.0.do_package.am335x-evm
> +libtool-2.4.2-r3.0.do_package.sigdata.ffb4b811e7643d5f37afbcffef84f5e8
> +libtool-2.4.2-r3.0.do_package_write
> +libtool-2.4.2-r3.0.do_package_write_ipk
> +libtool-2.4.2-r3.0.do_package_write_ipk.sigdata.eb16601f7f4f1afbfabc8542fea3af30
>  libtool-2.4.2-r3.0.do_patch
>  libtool-2.4.2-r3.0.do_patch.sigdata.7d028f6dc6a1bdf32aadc29a6444bebc
>  libtool-2.4.2-r3.0.do_populate_lic
>  libtool-2.4.2-r3.0.do_populate_lic.sigdata.ebd50cceb0903e1b277ad6f533055373
> +libtool-2.4.2-r3.0.do_populate_sysroot.am335x-evm
> +libtool-2.4.2-r3.0.do_populate_sysroot.sigdata.43f8d1df81e38dacd301eed5599094f1
>  libtool-2.4.2-r3.0.do_unpack
>  libtool-2.4.2-r3.0.do_unpack.sigdata.f97c2643ec8f5752b2537f305a45ca7e
> +libtool-cross-2.4.2-r3.1.do_build
> +libtool-cross-2.4.2-r3.1.do_compile
> +libtool-cross-2.4.2-r3.1.do_compile.sigdata.c04f058e41aabe9001f0b82764d51d24
> +libtool-cross-2.4.2-r3.1.do_configure
> +libtool-cross-2.4.2-r3.1.do_configure.sigdata.b37940faf1adfcc783e7a66eff351d4b
> +libtool-cross-2.4.2-r3.1.do_create_srcipk
> +libtool-cross-2.4.2-r3.1.do_create_srcipk.sigdata.37082cdfd6eb100923aab805101fe221
> +libtool-cross-2.4.2-r3.1.do_fetch
> +libtool-cross-2.4.2-r3.1.do_fetch.sigdata.79da02e9de369c7964c9b54e291088d5
> +libtool-cross-2.4.2-r3.1.do_install
> +libtool-cross-2.4.2-r3.1.do_install.sigdata.607177b917d48c411c6c2fbaf475867b
> +libtool-cross-2.4.2-r3.1.do_package.am335x-evm
> +libtool-cross-2.4.2-r3.1.do_package.sigdata.4f0eb910d74ff36b564968e09a8e15f2
> +libtool-cross-2.4.2-r3.1.do_package_write
> +libtool-cross-2.4.2-r3.1.do_package_write_ipk
> +libtool-cross-2.4.2-r3.1.do_package_write_ipk.sigdata.0cc36358a4c5dee1f612fe3a90c60b1a
> +libtool-cross-2.4.2-r3.1.do_patch
> +libtool-cross-2.4.2-r3.1.do_patch.sigdata.a319c3ae77229a7558409abc179ea99d
> +libtool-cross-2.4.2-r3.1.do_populate_lic
> +libtool-cross-2.4.2-r3.1.do_populate_lic.sigdata.82a19386b4380a0077d2b55f8934851a
> +libtool-cross-2.4.2-r3.1.do_populate_sysroot.am335x-evm
> +libtool-cross-2.4.2-r3.1.do_populate_sysroot.sigdata.8c61b5566945f9a439faa916d70a9fd0
> +libtool-cross-2.4.2-r3.1.do_unpack
> +libtool-cross-2.4.2-r3.1.do_unpack.sigdata.322a15e21f6df957f5ba116da19d5585
>  linux-libc-headers-3.2-r1.do_compile
>  linux-libc-headers-3.2-r1.do_compile.sigdata.6047c862356fa8f3a56269daf2cde26b
>  linux-libc-headers-3.2-r1.do_configure
> 
> Notice that the only stamps for steps done between a passing and failing build are for the libtool-cross, as well as the steps after the do_configure step of libtool since it passed this time.
> 
> The work directory difference was
> -----------------------------------
> --- libtool-failed-work	2012-10-04 09:17:50.137609986 -0500
> +++ libtool-passed-work	2012-10-04 09:17:50.137609986 -0500
> @@ -39,4 +39,5 @@ unifdef-native-2.6.18+git-r0
>  zlib-native-1.2.6-r1
>  external-arago-toolchain-1.0-r2
>  libtool-2.4.2-r3.0
> +libtool-cross-2.4.2-r3.1
>  linux-libc-headers-3.2-r1
> 
> So the only new package I saw show-up in my work directory was libtool-cross.
> 
> Does anyone have any other suggestions of what to look at since my
> testing is showing that adding libtool-cross into the build before
> libtool allows the build to pass.  I'll try going back to the internal
> toolchain instead of my external toolchain as another test to run but
> any other ideas would be appreciated.  Is my approach above even
> valid?

A list of file differences in the sysroots directory would help here.
Given the above, this amounts to the contents of the libtool-cross
package. Are you able to reproduce this with master or is this denzil
based?

Cheers,

Richard





More information about the Openembedded-core mailing list