[OE-core] [PATCH] coreutils: Upgrade to upstream version 8.17

[Saul Wold]

On 09/03/2012 01:52 AM, Radu Moisan wrote:
>
> On 08/22/2012 07:36 PM, Mark Hatle wrote:
>> On 8/22/12 9:30 AM, Chris Larson wrote:
>>> On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 7:26 AM, Khem Raj <raj.khem at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> diff --git
>>>>>>> a/meta/recipes-core/coreutils/coreutils-8.17/realpath-works-yes.patch
>>>>>>> b/meta/recipes-core/coreutils/coreutils-8.17/realpath-works-yes.patch
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> new file mode 100644
>>>>>>> index 0000000..e32f612
>>>>>>> --- /dev/null
>>>>>>> +++
>>>>>>> b/meta/recipes-core/coreutils/coreutils-8.17/realpath-works-yes.patch
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> @@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
>>>>>>> +Signed-off-by: Radu Moisan <radu.moisan at intel.com>
>>>>>>> +Upstream status: pending
>>>>>>> +
Should be Upstream-Status


>>>>>>> +The new version of coreutils, adds use of
>>>>>>> canonicalize_file_name() function defined in canonicalize.h
>>>>>>> +The problem: the function is redefined to
>>>>>>> rpl_canonicalize_file_name by means of a macro,which gives
>>>>>>> +an undefined reference error at compile time. Macro definition
>>>>>>> depends in the end on
>>>>>>> +gl_cv_func_realpath_works but assumed true only when set to "yes"
>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>> +Index: coreutils-8.17/m4/canonicalize.m4
>>>>>>> +===================================================================
>>>>>>> +--- coreutils-8.17.orig/m4/canonicalize.m4 2012-05-08
>>>>>>> 12:05:23.000000000 +0300
>>>>>>> ++++ coreutils-8.17/m4/canonicalize.m4  2012-08-17
>>>>>>> 14:20:22.000000000 +0300
>>>>>>> +@@ -95,7 +95,7 @@
>>>>>>> +      [gl_cv_func_realpath_works=no],
>>>>>>> +      [case "$host_os" in
>>>>>>> +                 # Guess yes on glibc systems.
>>>>>>> +-        *-gnu*) gl_cv_func_realpath_works="guessing yes" ;;
>>>>>>> ++        *-gnu*) gl_cv_func_realpath_works="yes" ;;
>>>>>>> +                 # If we don't know, assume the worst.
>>>>>>> +         *)      gl_cv_func_realpath_works="guessing no" ;;
>>>>>>> +       esac
>>>>>> Wouldn't it be better to provide a cached test result in the site
>>>>>> files for this test, rather than relying on a host_os based guess?
>>>>> I really don't know the answer to your question. The patch was
>>>>> intended to provide minimally invasive change to the original file.
>>>>> If you elaborate more on your proposal, I would gladly take into
>>>>> consideration a future patch to address this issue.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Add CACHED_CONFIGUREVARS in the recipe search in metadata for
>>>> existing examples
>>>
>>> That's a good route, but only if we know realpath works in 100% of
>>> cases. Which, admittedly, one would certainly hope is the case :)
>>>
>>
>> As far as I know realpath has worked well, for at least the last 6
>> years (likely much longer).
>>
>> --Mark
>>
> What's the status here? Is it going to be merged?
>
I think that you need to fix the recipe as suggested by the comments 
above, (ie use CACHED_CONFIGUREVARS).

Sau!


> radu
>
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-core mailing list
> Openembedded-core at lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
>
>