[OE-core] [PATCH 0/8] Patches for LSB perl test

[McClintock Matthew-B29882]

On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 10:01 AM, Saul Wold <sgw at linux.intel.com> wrote:
> On 08/31/2012 03:00 AM, Kang Kai wrote:
>>
>> The following changes since commit
>> b4c5725af4cd85d5644f0373e2674e903c4eab2b:
>>
>>    yocto-bsp: add missing xserver-xf86-config .bbappend for qemu
>> (2012-08-25 14:47:07 +0100)
>>
>> are available in the git repository at:
>>    git://git.pokylinux.org/poky-contrib kangkai/lsb
>>    http://git.pokylinux.org/cgit.cgi/poky-contrib/log/?h=kangkai/lsb
>>
>> Kang Kai (8):
>>    libclass-isa-perl: add it
>>    perl: package modules Pod-Html and Tie-Hash-NamedCapture
>>    libpod-plainer-perl: add it
>>    libdumpvalue-perl: add it
>>    libenv-perl: add it
>>    libfile-checktree-perl: add it
>>    libi18n-collate-perl: add it
>>    task-core-lsb: add packages
>>
>>   meta/recipes-devtools/perl/perl-5.14.2/config.sh   |    2 +-
>>   .../perl/libclass-isa-perl_0.36.bb                 |   32
>> +++++++++++++++++++
>>   .../perl/libdumpvalue-perl_1.16.bb                 |   20 ++++++++++++
>>   meta/recipes-extended/perl/libenv-perl_1.03.bb     |   22 +++++++++++++
>>   .../perl/libfile-checktree-perl_4.41.bb            |   33
>> ++++++++++++++++++++
>>   .../perl/libi18n-collate-perl_1.02.bb              |   22 +++++++++++++
>>   .../perl/libpod-plainer-perl_1.03.bb               |   24 ++++++++++++++
>>   meta/recipes-extended/tasks/task-core-lsb.bb       |    9 +++++-
>>   8 files changed, 162 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>   create mode 100644 meta/recipes-extended/perl/libclass-isa-perl_0.36.bb
>>   create mode 100644 meta/recipes-extended/perl/libdumpvalue-perl_1.16.bb
>>   create mode 100644 meta/recipes-extended/perl/libenv-perl_1.03.bb
>>   create mode 100644
>> meta/recipes-extended/perl/libfile-checktree-perl_4.41.bb
>>   create mode 100644
>> meta/recipes-extended/perl/libi18n-collate-perl_1.02.bb
>>   create mode 100644
>> meta/recipes-extended/perl/libpod-plainer-perl_1.03.bb
>>
>
> Kang,
>
> Given that LSB 5.0 is coming out that removes many of these requirements,
> does it really make sense to add these and then remove them again in a
> future release. I understand we are trying to be as
> compliant as possible to LSB, but this may best be in a meta-lsb layer.

Is a meta-lsb layer coming? Will it be apart of poky?

-M

>
> Sau!
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-core mailing list
> Openembedded-core at lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core