[OE-core] [PATCH v2] busybox: Upgrade to v1.21.0
Radu Moisan
radu.moisan at intel.com
Mon Apr 1 08:41:46 UTC 2013
On 03/29/2013 07:00 PM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 12:05:10PM +0200, Radu Moisan wrote:
>> Removed obsolete patches
>> Added a few new patches pending 1.21.1
>> *busybox-1.21.0-mdev.patch
>> *busybox-1.21.0-platform.patch
>> *busybox-1.21.0-xz.patch
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Radu Moisan <radu.moisan at intel.com>
>> ---
>> .../busybox-1.20.2/busybox-1.20.2-kernel_ver.patch | 28 -
>> .../busybox-mkfs-minix-tests_bigendian.patch | 34 --
>> .../fix-for-spurious-testsuite-failure.patch | 27 -
>> .../busybox/busybox-1.20.2/sys_resource.patch | 99 ---
>> .../busybox/busybox-1.20.2/wget_dl_dir_fix.patch | 30 -
>> .../B921600.patch | 0
>> .../busybox-1.21.0/busybox-1.21.0-mdev.patch | 643 ++++++++++++++++++++
>> .../busybox-1.21.0/busybox-1.21.0-platform.patch | 24 +
>> .../busybox/busybox-1.21.0/busybox-1.21.0-xz.patch | 84 +++
>> .../busybox-appletlib-dependency.patch | 0
>> .../busybox-udhcpc-no_deconfig.patch | 0
>> .../{busybox-1.20.2 => busybox-1.21.0}/defconfig | 0
>> .../get_header_tar.patch | 0
>> .../run-parts.in.usr-bin.patch | 6 +-
>> .../stat-usr-bin.patch | 0
>> ...estsuite-du-du-k-works-fix-false-positive.patch | 0
>> .../watch.in.usr-bin.patch | 0
>> .../{busybox_1.20.2.bb => busybox_1.21.0.bb} | 17 +-
>> 18 files changed, 762 insertions(+), 230 deletions(-)
>> delete mode 100644 meta/recipes-core/busybox/busybox-1.20.2/busybox-1.20.2-kernel_ver.patch
>> delete mode 100644 meta/recipes-core/busybox/busybox-1.20.2/busybox-mkfs-minix-tests_bigendian.patch
>> delete mode 100644 meta/recipes-core/busybox/busybox-1.20.2/fix-for-spurious-testsuite-failure.patch
>> delete mode 100644 meta/recipes-core/busybox/busybox-1.20.2/sys_resource.patch
>> delete mode 100644 meta/recipes-core/busybox/busybox-1.20.2/wget_dl_dir_fix.patch
>> rename meta/recipes-core/busybox/{busybox-1.20.2 => busybox-1.21.0}/B921600.patch (100%)
> I wonder how this applies without fuzz as
> it was applied upstream back in 2009:
> http://git.busybox.net/busybox/commit/?id=e707a3000b2f6e2f684b6e85cd60590318d157c4
Many patches apply with some fuzz, and that's fine as log as it applies
and keeps fixing something. However this one may not be necessary to
carry along indeed. I'll look into it and drop, same for
busybox-appletlib-dependency.patch if applied upstream.
Radu
More information about the Openembedded-core
mailing list