[OE-core] [PATCH 1/7] kernel.bbclass: Ensure we have correct version information in deploy data

[Richard Purdie]

Currently the names used for the kernel in deploy will contain "AUTOREV"
instead of the final incremental numbering. This fixes the problem by
ensuring data is obtained from the PR service and using the PKG* variables
instead of PE/PV/PR directly.

Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie at linuxfoundation.org>
---
 meta/classes/kernel.bbclass |    6 ++++--
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/meta/classes/kernel.bbclass b/meta/classes/kernel.bbclass
index 8c8c95b..00e27ef 100644
--- a/meta/classes/kernel.bbclass
+++ b/meta/classes/kernel.bbclass
@@ -200,6 +200,7 @@ kernel_do_install() {
 		sed -i 's#-I/usr/include/slang#-I=/usr/include/slang#g' $kerneldir/tools/perf/Makefile
 	fi
 }
+do_install[prefuncs] += "package_get_auto_pr"
 
 sysroot_stage_all_append() {
 	sysroot_stage_dir ${D}${KERNEL_SRC_PATH} ${SYSROOT_DESTDIR}${KERNEL_SRC_PATH}
@@ -333,11 +334,11 @@ do_sizecheck[dirs] = "${B}"
 
 addtask sizecheck before do_install after do_strip
 
-KERNEL_IMAGE_BASE_NAME ?= "${KERNEL_IMAGETYPE}-${PE}-${PV}-${PR}-${MACHINE}-${DATETIME}"
+KERNEL_IMAGE_BASE_NAME ?= "${KERNEL_IMAGETYPE}-${PKGE}-${PKGV}-${PKGR}-${MACHINE}-${DATETIME}"
 # Don't include the DATETIME variable in the sstate package signatures
 KERNEL_IMAGE_BASE_NAME[vardepsexclude] = "DATETIME"
 KERNEL_IMAGE_SYMLINK_NAME ?= "${KERNEL_IMAGETYPE}-${MACHINE}"
-MODULE_IMAGE_BASE_NAME ?= "modules-${PE}-${PV}-${PR}-${MACHINE}-${DATETIME}"
+MODULE_IMAGE_BASE_NAME ?= "modules-${PKGE}-${PKGV}-${PKGR}-${MACHINE}-${DATETIME}"
 MODULE_IMAGE_BASE_NAME[vardepsexclude] = "DATETIME"
 MODULE_TARBALL_BASE_NAME ?= "${MODULE_IMAGE_BASE_NAME}.tgz"
 # Don't include the DATETIME variable in the sstate package signatures
@@ -386,6 +387,7 @@ kernel_do_deploy() {
 	cd -
 }
 do_deploy[dirs] = "${DEPLOYDIR} ${B}"
+do_deploy[prefuncs] += "package_get_auto_pr"
 
 addtask deploy before do_build after do_install
 
-- 
1.7.10.4