[OE-core] [PATCH] connman: tist of connman do not support powerpc64
Jack Mitchell
ml at communistcode.co.uk
Fri Apr 26 09:33:50 UTC 2013
On 26/04/13 09:07, Chunrong Guo wrote:
> connman build for powerpc 64bit boards were producing errors like this:
> | make[1]: *** [plugins/plugins_tist_la-tist.lo] Error 1
> | make[1]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
> | make: *** [all] Error 2
> | ERROR: oe_runmake failed
>
> Signed-off-by: Chunrong Guo <B40290 at freescale.com>
> ---
> meta/recipes-connectivity/connman/connman.inc | 3 ++-
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/meta/recipes-connectivity/connman/connman.inc b/meta/recipes-connectivity/connman/connman.inc
> index 589ece8..5389f3a 100644
> --- a/meta/recipes-connectivity/connman/connman.inc
> +++ b/meta/recipes-connectivity/connman/connman.inc
> @@ -20,10 +20,11 @@ DEPENDS = "dbus glib-2.0 ppp iptables gnutls \
> ${@base_contains('DISTRO_FEATURES', '3g','ofono', '', d)} \
> "
>
> -INC_PR = "r19"
> +INC_PR = "r20"
>
> TIST = "--enable-tist"
> TIST_powerpc = ""
> +TIST_powerpc64 = ""
>
> EXTRA_OECONF += "\
> ac_cv_path_WPASUPPLICANT=${sbindir}/wpa_supplicant \
Is there a reason that we need to specifically enable TIST at all? This
is quoted from one of the developers on the ConnMan list:
> it is special hardware where we need this plugin for. As I said, I was considering to remove the plugin actually. So it is safe to > disable this plugin.
> By default this plugin is actually disabled. And we do not even build test it for the releases.
I think if anyone needs it, shout up; otherwise we should go with the default and disable it.
Cheers,
Jack.
--
Jack Mitchell (jack at embed.me.uk)
Embedded Systems Engineer
http://www.embed.me.uk
--
More information about the Openembedded-core
mailing list