[OE-core] [PATCH] rootfs_ipk, image: Add debug capture support

Mark Hatle mark.hatle at windriver.com
Fri Apr 26 14:16:33 UTC 2013


On 4/26/13 8:57 AM, Phil Blundell wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-04-25 at 08:47 -0500, Mark Hatle wrote:
>> Is this a problem that they should have used the update-alternatives for
>> sulogin?  (Sounds like it might be a security issue though...)  This would avoid
>> the .debug conflict.
>
> I dunno.  It seems a bit sad to force use of update-alternatives just to
> deconflict the .debug data (since the binaries in question would never
> be installed at the same time anyway), and in general it seems like we
> want less update-alternatives rather than more of it.
>
> But I guess that would indeed solve the problem and it's probably the
> lowest-effort thing that does.  So maybe that's the way ahead.

The alternative of course is to crease special -dbg packages for the two 
conflicting items.  I.e. foo-dbg, foo-sulogin-dbg, bar-dbg and bar-sulogin-dbg...

--Mark

> p.
>
>





More information about the Openembedded-core mailing list