[OE-core] [PATCH 2/4] dbus: Drop libx11 dependency when building without 'x11' distro feature

Richard Purdie richard.purdie at linuxfoundation.org
Sun Feb 17 15:10:11 UTC 2013


On Sun, 2013-02-17 at 11:52 -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 11:48 AM, Richard Purdie
> <richard.purdie at linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> > On Sun, 2013-02-17 at 10:55 -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> >> On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 10:44 AM, Richard Purdie
> >> <richard.purdie at linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> >> > On Sun, 2013-02-17 at 10:40 -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> >> >> On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 4:47 AM, Richard Purdie
> >> >> <richard.purdie at linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> >> >> > On Sat, 2013-02-16 at 19:20 -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> >> >> >> Signed-off-by: Otavio Salvador <otavio at ossystems.com.br>
> >> >> >> ---
> >> >> >>  meta/recipes-core/dbus/dbus.inc | 2 +-
> >> >> >>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> diff --git a/meta/recipes-core/dbus/dbus.inc b/meta/recipes-core/dbus/dbus.inc
> >> >> >> index 292ab29..cebab28 100644
> >> >> >> --- a/meta/recipes-core/dbus/dbus.inc
> >> >> >> +++ b/meta/recipes-core/dbus/dbus.inc
> >> >> >> @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://COPYING;md5=10dded3b58148f3f1fd804b26354af3e \
> >> >> >>  X11DEPENDS = "virtual/libx11 libsm"
> >> >> >>  DEPENDS = "expat virtual/libintl ${@base_contains('DISTRO_FEATURES', 'x11', '${X11DEPENDS}', '', d)}"
> >> >> >>  DEPENDS_class-native = "expat-native virtual/libintl-native"
> >> >> >> -DEPENDS_class-nativesdk = "nativesdk-expat virtual/nativesdk-libintl virtual/libx11"
> >> >> >> +DEPENDS_class-nativesdk = "nativesdk-expat virtual/nativesdk-libintl ${@base_contains('DISTRO_FEATURES', 'x11', 'virtual/libx11', '', d)}"
> >> >> >>  RDEPENDS_dbus = "${@base_contains('DISTRO_FEATURES', 'ptest', 'dbus-ptest', '', d)}"
> >> >> >>  RDEPENDS_class-native = ""
> >> >> >
> >> >> > This tends to be a really bad idea for dbus-nativesdk. If you install an
> >> >> > SDK compiled with these options into PATH only a system which does have
> >> >> > x11, it will break functionality in a way unacceptable to users.
> >> >>
> >> >> I don't see how it'd break anything being deployed in a toolchain. We
> >> >> don't initialize the dbus daemon so it is mostly used to fulfill
> >> >> dependencies.
> >> >
> >> > Imagine you source the toolchain setup script. The limited functionality
> >> > dbus-launch just got into PATH. Now you run some X application. Things
> >> > break.
> >>
> >> You usually to not source the env script and run your X server on top
> >> of it, I think. Personally I source it in a terminal session inside of
> >> X and use it to build things only.
> >
> > No, but people do open a terminal in X and then source the script there,
> > then run other X applications from within the terminal window. Those X
> > applications can use dbus activation. A dbus-launch without x11 support
> > causes problems in this situation.
> 
> Yes; got it.
> 
> So your idea is to avoid x11 dependency altogether and drop
> dbus-launch to avoid this errors?

Yes, I did the same thing with dbus-native for exactly this reason (e.g.
X apps from within a devshell). I didn't touch dbus-nativesdk since it
has the X dependency and I didn't think it was bothering anyone.

Cheers,

Richard







More information about the Openembedded-core mailing list