[OE-core] [PATCH 1/3] libaudit: new package

Tom Zanussi tom.zanussi at linux.intel.com
Thu Feb 28 04:45:05 UTC 2013


On Wed, 2013-02-27 at 20:32 -0800, Saul Wold wrote:
> On 02/27/2013 07:00 AM, tom.zanussi at linux.intel.com wrote:
> > From: Tom Zanussi <tom.zanussi at linux.intel.com>
> >
> > Add libaudit, used by system call auditing applications.  From the
> > sources:
> >
> >   "The audit package contains the user space utilities for storing and
> >   searching the audit records generate by the audit subsystem in the
> >   Linux 2.6 kernel."
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Tom Zanussi <tom.zanussi at linux.intel.com>
> > ---
> >   .../libaudit/libaudit/build-lib-only.patch         |  33 ++
> >   .../libaudit/libaudit/fix-host-gen.patch           | 461 +++++++++++++++++++++
> >   meta/recipes-support/libaudit/libaudit_2.2.2.bb    |  25 ++
> >   3 files changed, 519 insertions(+)
> >   create mode 100644 meta/recipes-support/libaudit/libaudit/build-lib-only.patch
> >   create mode 100644 meta/recipes-support/libaudit/libaudit/fix-host-gen.patch
> >   create mode 100644 meta/recipes-support/libaudit/libaudit_2.2.2.bb
> 
> >
> <SNIP>
> 
> 
> > diff --git a/meta/recipes-support/libaudit/libaudit_2.2.2.bb b/meta/recipes-support/libaudit/libaudit_2.2.2.bb
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 0000000..e28b619
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/meta/recipes-support/libaudit/libaudit_2.2.2.bb
> > @@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
> > +DESCRIPTION = "libaudit is the dynamic library needed for applications to use the audit framework."
> > +SECTION = "libs"
> > +AUTHOR = "Steve Grubb <sgrubb at redhat.com>"
> > +HOMEPAGE = "http://people.redhat.com/sgrubb/audit/"
> > +LICENSE = "LGPLv2+"
> > +LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://COPYING;md5=94d55d512a9ba36caa9b7df079bae19f"
> > +PR = "r0"
> > +
> > +SRC_URI = "http://people.redhat.com/sgrubb/audit/audit-${PV}.tar.gz \
> > +           file://build-lib-only.patch \
> > +           file://fix-host-gen.patch \
> > +          "
> > +
> > +SRC_URI[md5sum] = "6641fde111cf5dfda6d4282ab8410df5"
> > +SRC_URI[sha256sum] = "8bc2b45a5f08f5df6cebcd5543f24b7e68e28b64da4b23f08de2c6616384302b"
> > +
> > +S = "${WORKDIR}/audit-${PV}"
> > +
> > +inherit autotools
> > +
> > +EXTRA_OECONF = "--disable-dependency-tracking --disable-listener"
> > +
> > +do_configure() {
> > +	       oe_runconf
> > +}
> >
> Is this do_configure really needed?  Does the autotools default not work 
> correctly?  And if not why not?

This is to avoid the autoreconf step, which ends up overwriting the
lib/Makefile.in changes when it regenerates it from lib/Makefile.am.

The Makefile.in is shipped with the source tarball, so I modified it
directly instead of complicating things by trying to get autoreconf to
generate the correct Makefile for the target part of the build vs these
specific changes to Makefile.in for the set of programs generated to run
on the host.

Tom

> 
> Sau!
> 






More information about the Openembedded-core mailing list