[OE-core] [PATCH V6 6/6] core-image-sato: support read-only rootfs

Otavio Salvador otavio at ossystems.com.br
Mon Jan 7 10:30:07 UTC 2013


On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 1:06 AM, ChenQi <Qi.Chen at windriver.com> wrote:
> On 01/07/2013 03:05 AM, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, Jan 6, 2013 at 7:44 AM,  <Qi.Chen at windriver.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> From: Chen Qi <Qi.Chen at windriver.com>
>>>
>>> Support read-only rootfs by providing a specific conf file for volatile
>>> storage.
>>>
>>> [YOCTO #3406]
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Chen Qi <Qi.Chen at windriver.com>
>>
>> I prefer this solution than the previous one however why you don't use
>> a sato-volatile-conf package to provide this?
>
> Because the there exists a one-to-one (or almost one-to-one) correspondence
> between the volatile conf file and the specific image.
>
> If there is a 'sato-volatile-conf' package, then there should be a
> 'minimal-volatile-conf', and maybe a 'custom-volatile-conf' if users are
> using a customized image.
>
> So I think it's simpler to let the image recipe provide the conf file.
> The only thing we have to do, when adding read-only rootfs support to some
> image, is to add the conf file to SRC_URI and install it in
> choose_volatile_conf.

The problem of not using a package for it is regarding upgrades; it is
not possible to upgrade the configuration file using the package
manager. I know most systems using the read-only-fs will be small and
do not use a package manager at all but some use cases will do (mine,
in case).

So I do believe we ought to have a one-to-one correspondence here.

--
Otavio Salvador                             O.S. Systems
E-mail: otavio at ossystems.com.br  http://www.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854              http://projetos.ossystems.com.br




More information about the Openembedded-core mailing list