[OE-core] [PATCH v2 04/15] file: replace obsolete automake macros with working ones

[Richard Purdie]

On Mon, 2013-01-07 at 01:49 +0200, Marko Lindqvist wrote:
> Add obsolete-automake-macros.patch that replaces automake macros
> no longer supported by automake-1.13 with modern constructs.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Marko Lindqvist <cazfi74 at gmail.com>
> ---
>  .../file/file/obsolete_automake_macros.patch            |   15 +++++++++++++++
>  meta/recipes-devtools/file/file_5.11.bb                 |    3 ++-
>  2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>  create mode 100644 meta/recipes-devtools/file/file/obsolete_automake_macros.patch
> 
> diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/file/file/obsolete_automake_macros.patch b/meta/recipes-devtools/file/file/obsolete_automake_macros.patch
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..8b0d34c
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/file/file/obsolete_automake_macros.patch
> @@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
> +Upstream-Status: Fixed in file-5.12

Can we use a standard syntax for this, something like:

Upstream-Status: Backport (fixed in file-5.12)

(as mentioned in
https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/Contribution_Guidelines#Patch_Header_Recommendations)

for the same reasons as I just mentioned to Marcin - so we can tell from
scripts what status patches have and it helps reviewers in future know
this can be dropped. The aim is to push patches upstream and standard
syntax means we can get real numbers for how many patches we're
carrying.

I appreciate you can read and tell from the above what it means but I
really want to try and use a consistent syntax.

Cheers,

Richard