[OE-core] "bitbake -c fetchall" doesn't process EXTRA_IMAGEDEPENDS
Richard Purdie
richard.purdie at linuxfoundation.org
Wed Jan 30 13:02:23 UTC 2013
On Tue, 2013-01-29 at 04:41 -0500, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> back in november, i whined thusly:
>
> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/2012-November/031997.html
>
> is this the *intended* behaviour? since it seems that if i do a
> "bitbake -c fetchall", i should expect that i now have *all* software
> related to my target, and that's clearly not the case here.
Someone filed a bug in bugzilla about this. Bitbake is behaving as
intended and likely there is missing dependency information in the
fetchall case. This is a metadata level problem, not a bitbake one.
Patches naturally welcome to add the correct dependency information.
Cheers,
Richard
More information about the Openembedded-core
mailing list