[OE-core] [PATCH V3 0/2] BlueZ 5 experimental recipes

[Phil Blundell]

On Tue, 2013-07-16 at 17:28 +0300, Cristian Iorga wrote:
> Observe my investigation below in order to decide if RREPLACES is needed.
> Conclusion: BlueZ 5.x will be eventually an upgrade path for an already installed
> embedded device. As such, RREPLACES is needed for a system-wide upgrade.

It wasn't very obvious to me that these results make a compelling case
for bluez4 needing to RREPLACE bluez5.  Indeed, this section:

root at qemux86:~# opkg install bluez5
Multiple replacers for bluez5, using first one (bluez4).
Package bluez4 is already installed on root.
root at qemux86:~# opkg list-installed | grep bluez
bluez4 - 4.101-r6.0
libasound-module-bluez - 4.101-r6.0

... seems to illustrate (modulo the usual amount of opkg craziness) why
having it be so is not a very good thing.

p.